Is it good to share?

13th May 2013


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Reporting ,
  • Management ,
  • Benchmarking ,
  • Business & Industry



Seb Beloe asks whether sustainability reports ever provide added value for investors?

When discussing the possibility of creating a sustainability report, the chief executive of a large US conglomerate said: “You want us to produce one of those corporate socialist reports?” This incredulous response may not be a typical reaction, but it does belie a deep-seated misunderstanding about the role and value of sustainability reporting.

Such reporting is a sizeable and growing industry. Corporate Register, which monitors the global output of corporate responsibility, sustainability and environment reports, estimates that, in 2011, there were approximately 6,600 such reports – up from fewer than 1,000 in 2001 and just 40 in 1992. But is all this effort really worth it? Do investors even read these reports?

Starting point

Many environment and social issues are directly relevant to a company’s ability to create long-term value for its shareholders. Whether it is increasingly scare resources affecting the price and volatility of commodities, population change driving skills shortages or the rapid evolution in technology that is enabling a more active and influential citizenry, the world is changing and companies need to respond.

Unfortunately, sustainability reports are often seen as an opportunity to spout trite public relations guff. They can also be very lengthy and are not always accurate.

A few years ago a large Italian utility reported carbon dioxide emissions of 122 billion tonnes. If you think that sounds like a lot, you’d be right – it is more than four times the entire planet’s production of CO2 in 2009. Unfortunately, this is not the only or even most egregious example.

ABB, a multiple reporting award-winner, was found to have overstated its sulphur oxide emissions by a factor of 1,000 for seven years, during which time it won many of its accolades. Meanwhile, Ford managed to both halve and double its water consumption in the same year (2006). What is perhaps more shocking than the errors themselves is the fact that no one spotted them for a long time.

These examples are now a few years old, and the quality of data and of reporting has, in general, improved markedly. In part, this is due to the growing importance that is attached to a firm’s performance on these issues.

Carbon is now priced in a growing number of global markets and is soon to be subject to mandatory reporting in the UK. Investors are slowly integrating critical social and environment issues into their investment models. Bloomberg, for example, now provides data on more than 120 ESG (environmental, social and governance) indicators for about 5,000 publicly-listed companies worldwide.

While there is no doubt that better quality data are more readily available, for many mainstream investors interest remains fleeting and is often limited to one or two critical issues, such as safety in the mining industry and carbon emissions in power generation.

This is particularly true for investors with short-term investment horizons. If an investor intends to hold a firm’s shares for a matter of months – the average holding period on the London Stock Exchange is around seven months – then most ESG issues would be considered irrelevant. However, for investors with longer-term investment plans these issues become more important.

Taking the long view

When a shareholding lasts for more than three or four years several factors – including a firm’s relationships with its stakeholders (regulators, employees, suppliers and local communities) and its operating expenses (energy, productivity, raw material use) – become critical in understanding whether it will create value.

Unfortunately, sustainability reports rarely address ESG issues in this way. This is largely because the audience for these reports is almost never clearly defined. In reality, they are a “catch-all” document designed for everybody and nobody.

That is not to say that no-one is interested, more that the report format is the wrong way to communicate sustainability data. Instead companies should disseminate this information through existing channels that make sense to the end user. For example, they could use marketing and advertising to connect sustainability credentials to customers; compliance submissions with regulators; procurement codes with suppliers; and annual financial reports with investors.

Efforts by the International Integrated Reporting Council to develop a global reporting framework are, at least from an investment perspective, particularly critical. The draft framework (consultation ends on 15 July) defines the key parameters of what corporate reporting, sustainability or otherwise, should look like. It focuses on communicating how organisations create long-term value in terms of financial, human, societal and natural capital.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

How much is too much?

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

Ben Goodwin reflects on policy, practice and advocacy over the past year

2nd April 2024

Read more

In 2020, IEMA and the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) jointly wrote and published A User Guide to Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. This has now been updated to include three key developments in the field.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Hello and welcome to another edition of Transform. I hope that you’ve had a good and productive few months so far.

28th March 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close