In Parliament >> Green Deal - masterstroke or damp squib?
- Construction ,
- Mitigation ,
Alan Whitehead, MP for Southampton West, discusses the problem of take-up when it comes to investing in energy efficiency.
The Energy Bill aims to tackle the pressing issue of energy efficiency in Britain’s homes by addressing head-on the problem of take-up: how do you get the millions of homes still falling woefully short on home energy measures to retrofit both for the good of the householder and the nation’s energy demand levels?
Capital investment upfront puts too many people off investing in energy efficiency.
The planned “Green Deal” seeks to get over this problem by splitting the benefits so that the householder has nothing to pay upfront: an interested company, such as B&Q, puts in the cash for improvements, and via a charge on the energy bill of the property – not the inhabitant – recovers its money and makes something besides.
The householder gets lower bills and a more efficient home. But it is in this split that the problems begin.
In order to get a return on investment, a company providing the capital will want a reasonable rate of return, and the government has already announced that the “deal” will turn on a “golden rule” – the householder’s energy bills will not be higher after the work than before it.
These two factors radically limit the amount that can go into the house and what the money will purchase – mostly restricted to worthwhile but not earthshattering additions, such as wall and loft insulation.
Home-based power generation will be out, and the seven million or so “hard to treat” properties – solid walled and often off grid – will be a long way from inclusion.
In short, in seeking to move home energy efficiency forward through cost-neutral investment from the private sector, the government risks the deal turning out to be a damp squib of a measure, even if the investors can be found in the current difficult economic climate.
The Green Homes Grant is set to deliver only a fraction of the jobs and improvements intended, leading to calls for more involvement from local authorities in future schemes.
COVID-19 recovery packages have largely focused on protecting, rather than transforming, existing industries, and have been a “lost opportunity” for speeding up the global energy transition.
None of England’s water and sewerage companies achieved all environmental expectations for the period 2015 to 2020, the Environment Agency has revealed. These targets included the reduction of total pollution incidents by at least one-third compared with 2012, and for incident self-reporting to be at least 75%.
The UK’s pipeline for renewable energy projects could mitigate 90% of job losses caused by COVID-19 and help deliver the government’s ‘levelling up’ agenda. That is according to a recent report from consultancy EY-Parthenon, which outlines how the UK’s £108bn “visible pipeline” of investible renewable energy projects could create 625,000 jobs.
Billions of people worldwide have been unable to access safe drinking water and sanitation in their homes during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a progress report from the World Health Organisation focusing on the UN’s sixth Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 6) – to “ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all by 2030”.
The UK will no longer use unabated coal to generate electricity from October 2024, one year earlier than originally planned, the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy has announced.
The UK government is not on track to deliver on its promise to improve the environment within a generation and is failing to stem the tide of biodiversity loss, a damning new report from MPs has revealed.