Impacts and effects: Do we really understand the difference?

25th January 2012


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Local government ,
  • Property ,
  • Construction ,
  • Natural resources

Author

IEMA

Jamie Gleave offers a practitioner's view on the differences between impacts and effects and how the terms are used in environmental impact assessments

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive (85/337/EEC) ensures that certain types of projects likely to have significant effects on the environment are subject to environmental assessment prior to approval or authorisation.

While the term “environmental impact assessment” describes the process undertaken, the EIA Directive calls for environmental effects to be identified and reported in an environmental statement, in order that decision-makers can be fully informed of the implications of proposals prior to granting development consent.

The wording throughout the EIA Directive places clear emphasis on the identification of environmental effects, with limited reference being made to identifying impacts, save for a brief mention in Article 7 and Annex III.

In undertaking EIA, it is commonplace for practitioners to correlate the sensitivity of the receiving environmental resource, or receptor, with the potential impact, to identify the environmental effect. The significance of an effect is then frequently determined by way of professional judgement and/or the use of matrices.

The definition and prediction of impacts and effects are, therefore, two separate aspects in the EIA process but which have a clear relationship with each other.

Seasoned EIA practitioners may have observed that it is routine in environmental statements and best-practice guidance for the terms “impact” and “effect” to be used interchangeably. This is more often a reflection of the author not wanting to use the same term repeatedly, rather than a deliberate attempt to use the terms in their correct context.

Given the purpose of the EIA Directive, and the liberal manner in which both terms can be used in EIA, this raises the important question of whether we really understand the difference between “impacts” and “effects” when undertaking and reporting EIAs.

Definitions of both terms vary depending on which literary source is referenced and in some established guidance there is a notable absence of a glossary explaining their meaning.

Where definitions are available in EIA guidance, the general consensus is that impacts are defined as the changes resulting from an action, and effects are defined as the consequences of impacts.

If, by way of example, we were to take a new bypass as a development proposal and the local landscape as the sensitive environmental resource, then an impact (the change arising from the development’s progression) could be the permanent loss of mature trees and hedgerows. An effect (the consequence of the impact), on the other hand, could be the opening of new views towards the new bypass or a change in the perception of local landscape character.

The distinction between the two terms in this example is fairly clear, however, for other environmental topics such as noise, this distinction can be much less apparent.

Matters are not helped by the fact that some topic-specific guidance does not provide a means of identifying and reporting significant environmental effects, or rather they require the significance of impacts to be established.

Difficulties can arise where technical specialists follow their own best-practice guidance and duly provide what they consider to be EIA compliant inputs to the project environmental coordinator. Faced with a package of reports by different authors – each reporting impacts and effects in their own particular way – the coordinator often feels obliged to rework assessments and terminology in an effort to try and establish a modicum of consistency across the EIA.

While it is never considered best-practice to attempt to change assessments that have relied on and followed best-practice guidance, the overarching requirement to report significant environmental effects under the EIA Directive remains. The identification and reporting of significant environmental impacts in an environmental statement could, therefore, be viewed as falling short of the requirements of the EIA Directive.

EIA, by its very name, implies we should be assessing impacts yet the content of the EIA Directive suggests otherwise. Genuine challenges therefore exist in terms of consistently defining what constitutes an “impact” and what constitutes an “effect” across a series of individual assessments.

When taking an overview of all the published guidance and standards that EIA practitioners currently operate under, the inconsistencies become clear and reveal a genuine problem in current EIA practice.

The accurate reporting of significant environmental effects within a multidisciplinary process can only really be achieved when there is a robust understanding of the two terms, and when topic-specific methodologies provide a means of consistently identifying and predicting them.


This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Jamie Gleave is a principal EIA consultant at RSK Environment. He is a Chartered environmentalist and Chartered scientist a Full member of IEMA and a Full member of the Institution of Environmental Sciences.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close