Impact significance - a risk-based approach

24th February 2012

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Local government ,
  • Property ,
  • Energy ,
  • Construction ,
  • Business & Industry



Derek Duckett from Xodus gives the practitioner's view on using a risk-based approach to assessing the significance of impacts

There are various methods of determining environmental impact significance which have a range of benefits, but also some limitations. Developing an approach to significance assessment that incorporates impact likelihood can help to resolve some of the potential limitations.

Identifying the issues

The first step is to identify which issues should be included in the assessment and to justify exclusions.

An effective method of identifying issues for significance assessment is to conduct an environmental issues identification (ENVID) workshop. This workshop should be undertaken during scoping and revisited throughout the project as designs are refined and mitigation strategies developed. The workshop should include relevant project staff including engineers and environmental personnel, for example.

The selected staff can work through all project aspects and make an assessment of each in terms of potential significant impact. This process should be formalised to ensure that is facilitated and recorded correctly.

The output of the workshop process is a matrix which records assessment of each impact’s significance in terms of its consequence and likelihood.

Consideration of likelihood

The more likely the change, the greater the significance will be. Consider, for example, the following definition: “Receptor sensitivity X potential impact magnitude = potential environmental consequence.”
Essentially, the likelihood of the potential overall consequence of the impact occurring is then explicitly taken into account to derive the impact significance.

One of the challenges in this process is to effectively and transparently communicate an impact significance that incorporates an assessment of likelihood. For some projects consequences can be very severe, but they will also have low probability of occurring. Impact significance assessment is often supported by modelling and this likelihood can be explicitly included in significance assessment.

Stakeholder perception and regulatory compliance can be combined with environmental consequence, where appropriate, to give an overall consequence. The potential overall consequence is then combined with likelihood to give the impact significance (see figure 1 below). The inclusion of regulatory, stakeholder and likelihood considerations provides an integrated assessment of the significance of risk or impact.

Figure 1: Impact significance flow chartFigure 1: Impact significance flow chart

Figure 1: Impact significance flow chart

There are, however, a number of challenges in assessing impact significance including:
• The double counting of impacts through confusion around impact magnitude, consequence and likelihood.

• An inconsistency of definitions across different industry disciplines.

• Ensuring consistency across different environments and assessment regimes.

Good communication and setting clear, explicit boundaries to incorporate varying definitions and assessment methods are key to resolving these challenges.

Example: Tidal turbine impact on seals

Underestimation of impact significance:

  • The impact magnitude for fatal seal-turbine interaction is assessed as negligible as the impact is considered extremely unlikely.
  • The overall consequence is then assessed as low because the “negligible magnitude” has brought down the high receptor-sensitivity, regulatory and stakeholder ratings.
  • The impact significance is therefore assessed as negligible because the “low overall consequence” has been combined with a “negligible likelihood”.

More accurate assessment:

  • The impact magnitude assessed as severe as the assumption is made that impact will occur.
  • The overall consequence is then assessed as high as receptor-sensitivity is high and there are also high ratings for stakeholder/regulatory requirements.
  • The impact significance is assessed as moderate (ie requiring mitigation) as the “negligible likelihood” of impact is combined with a “high consequence”

Lessons learned from the oil, gas and marine energy sector

Our experience in the oil and gas sector, and on a recent marine energy project, has reinforced the importance of effective communication and the engagement of all stakeholders to ensure the significance of impacts is accurately assessed.

EIA practitioners must ensure the development of consultation strategies and facilitation of stakeholder engagement throughout the EIA process, including the full involvement of engineering, design and management teams into the ESIA using ENVID workshops.

Practitioners should provide environmental advice throughout the project life cycle including best available techniques assessments.

For renewable energy projects involving new technologies an integrated approach is required to EIA and the design process. It is important to ensure clear communication with the developer, the regulator and the local community. Baseline survey methodologies must also be fit for purpose not only for your EIA but also for monitoring once installation completed and for future EIA.

Using a method of assessing impact significance that explicitly takes account of environmental, stakeholder and regulatory potential consequence and then combines this overall consequence with likelihood to give the impact significance, teases apart the various aspects of significance assessment.

The strength of this method is that each step deals with one aspect of significance at a time and, when used correctly, allows stakeholders to follow the logical steps that have led to the impact significance rating.

This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Derek Duckett is a senior environmental consultant at Xodus


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Four in five shoppers willing to pay ‘sustainability premium’

Despite cost-of-living concerns, four-fifths of shoppers are willing to pay more for sustainably produced or sourced goods, a global survey has found.

16th May 2024

Read more

One in five UK food businesses are not prepared for EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) coming into force in December, a new survey has uncovered.

16th May 2024

Read more

Each person in the UK throws a shocking 35 items of unwanted clothes and textiles into general waste every year on average, according to a new report from WRAP.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close