If it's too late, why bother?

30th April 2013


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Stewardship ,
  • Ecodesign ,
  • Mitigation ,
  • Adaptation

Author

IEMA

With global carbon emissions continuing to rise, professor Jem Bendell, from the Institute for Leadership and Sustainability, argues that it might be time to embrace eco-realism and a sense of adventure

How often do you talk about the state of the world? Lost any friends along the way? My adult life has been shaped by a concern for the planet, yet I found it dull to discuss probable doom.

In any case, we’ve been told it’s not useful to dwell on that – we need to inspire people to action, including ourselves. Don’t we need a sense of “hope” to win clients, customers, donors, even voters? Maybe. But by trying to remain upbeat we could be censoring our minds. We’ll hit 400ppm next year, so isn’t it time for more eco-realism? We must reassess what we are doing and why.

Let us not be afraid to consider what it might mean if it is too late to avert massive disruption in the lifetimes of children born today. The latest WorldWatch Institute's annual report asks: “What if it is too late for sustainability?”

It discusses a range of adaptation issues, concluding that a key question is now: “How much can we save?” For me, there’s a bigger implication. Sure, significant action now will reduce the damage. Yet we don’t have action that is significant in terms of atmospheric readings.

Our systems for acting together have been failing us, ever since 1987 when the UN general assembly first recognised climate change as a major problem. That includes media, politics, economics, monetary systems, intergovernmental processes, religions and more.

We need to ask why this is happening, and that doesn’t mean asking who to blame, but delving deeper into the causes of inaction, and learning more about rapid change processes.

Working on explicitly “environmental” things may be the less relevant, if what we need is a fundamental transformation of society and economy. For myself, a focus on causes led me to understand more about monetary systems, so I now work on innovation in alternative currencies.

Although action now will reduce the damage, it won’t stop massive disruption. So, we need to consider how to help future generations get through the disruption and suffering.

What kind of ancestors are we? Will we be despised for our stupidity and selfishness? Perhaps, but some of us may be able to help shape ways of life, values, ideas, and systems that might help future generations. Strangely, this could be a very creative cultural moment.

These questions, and many more, will arise from opening our minds to a much broader adaptation agenda. I often hear people say: “If it’s too late, why bother?”, closing down the conversation. Yet that needs to be the starting point for a new conversation about strategy and values.

If a threat seems insurmountable, it can be paralysing. Yet in most cultures there is a way of thinking about apparently impossible challenges that inspires people to new heights, and to approach any struggle as a journey of self-discovery.

That concept is adventure – a positive approach to an unusual and exciting, sometimes hazardous, experience or activity. The spirit of adventure has played a key role in the advance of all culture and science. Chosen or not, sustainability is the adventure of our time.

A very different future is coming, and we have to explore different ways of living, producing, trading, consuming. It won't just come from new consumer choices or enlightened business. Sadly, it's going to involve some discomfort and periods when we feel at the edge of our abilities.

It is from this starting point that we are exploring sustainability leadership at the new Institute for Leadership and Sustainability, and why we are launching with an event celebrating “Adventures in Sustainability” at the Royal Geographical Society.

We don't know whether sustainability is still possible, but that's the true place from where to begin the adventure. So we don’t need to worry about being “doom and gloom” anymore and instead see where an attitude of “doom and bloom” might take us. That’s where we recognise what the latest science and inaction means for our futures, but where we look for what positive things may emerge from the disruption and transition that is now inevitable.


Professor Jem Bendell is founder of the Institute for Leadership and Sustainability. He is speaking at Adventures in Sustainability at the Royal Geographical Society on 28 May 2013.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

EU and UK citizens fear net-zero delivery deficit

Support for net zero remains high across the UK and the EU, but the majority of citizens don't believe that major emitters and governments will reach their climate targets in time.

16th May 2024

Read more

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

Taxing the extraction of fossil fuels in the world’s most advanced economies could raise $720bn (£575bn) by 2030 to support vulnerable countries facing climate damages, analysis has found.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close