IEMA calls for long-term green tax strategy
The chancellor's Autumn statement must provide a clear long-term commitment on environmental taxes to secure business investment and drive energy efficiency savings, warns IEMA
Long-term certainty is vital for business investment decisions in environmental measures such as energy efficiency. By perpetuating uncertainty with green taxes, the government risks failing to achieve its environmental policy objectives for climate change and the delay will increase the costs of investment to business, according to IEMA.
The Institute is calling for the government to reconfirms its 2011 policy on environmental taxation in the chancellor's Autumn statement on 5 December and to set environmental tax levels up to 2020, to give business the opportunity to invest in energy efficiency and carbon reduction.
“Green taxes have the potential to drive environment and sustainability right to the heart of business decision making, by gaining the attention of the finance director and catalysing improved environmental performance,” said Martin Baxter, executive director of policy at IEMA. "However, if poorly conceived, they act as a cost on business, undermining competitiveness without achieving their full environmental potential."
In the 2011 Budget, the government pledged to "increase the proportion of tax revenue accounted for by environmental taxes".
The Treasury defines environmental taxes as those which:
- are explicitly linked to the government’s environmental objectives;
- have the primary objective of encouraging environmentally positive behaviour change; and
- are structured in relation to environmental objectives - for example, the more polluting the behaviour, the greater the tax levied.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.
Over two million hectares of Brazilian rainforest could be legally converted to supply the UK with soy under a new anti-deforestation law proposed by the government, the WWF has found.
In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).
In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.