Health assessments in EIA

27th January 2014


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Stakeholder engagement ,
  • Consultancy ,
  • Construction

Author

Graeme Miles

Bryony Cunningham, from SKM Enviros, discusses the emergence of health impact assessments as a theme in environmental impact assessment (EIA)

Almost every development that requires planning permission has the potential to affect human health. Some links are obvious, for example, increased road traffic or emissions to air from dust. Others are less so, such as the impact a project may have on public open spaces and the ability of the local community to exercise, with its associated health benefits. Another example is the impact of increasing traffic along residential streets, which could lead to a lack of neighbourly contact, social isolation and consequent poorer physical and mental health.

For many years the link between development and health was not considered by planning legislation and considered “not a land-use issue”. However, the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 began to change this, with the role of planning now widened to formally take account of the environmental, social and economic impacts of developments. Recent legislative changes (including the Planning Act 2008 and the Health and Social Care Act 2012 and proposed revisions to the EIA Directive) will ensure greater consideration of health issues in the EIA process going forward.

Under the Planning Act 2008, the Health Protection Agency is a statutory consultee for nationally significant infrastructure project applications likely to involve chemicals, poisons or radiation that could potentially cause harm to people. The Centre for Radiation, Chemicals and Environmental Hazards coordinates a response to the Planning Inspectorate’s national infrastructure directorate on these issues. The centre regularly requests that health risk assessments are included within the EIA process and that hazard identification, risk assessment, mitigation and risk management are specifically addressed in the environmental statement.

The Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act (2007) required local authorities and primary care trusts (PCTs) to produce a joint strategic needs assessment of the health and wellbeing of local communities. Needs assessment is an essential tool for informing planning and commissioning strategies. The Health and Social Care Act 2012 was subsequently implemented in April 2013, and led to abolition of PCTs and strategic health authorities. Their functions are now undertaken by health and wellbeing boards and clinical commissioning groups, with the responsibility for local population health improvement now lying with local authorities.

Examples where this has led to a change in the planning system include Halton Borough Council’s core strategy (Policy CS22), which requires that: “Applications for large scale major development are supported by a health impact assessment to enhance potential positive impacts of development and mitigate against any negative impacts.” This consideration of health within development plan policy is now resulting in assessment of health issues increasingly becoming a fundamental component of EIAs completed within the borough. With increased responsibility for public health now vested in local authorities it is likely that development plan policies will increasingly require health assessments to be carried out within the planning process.

There is an emerging body of reference material to assist EIA professionals address these issues. In the UK, the HIA Gateway (operated by the Association of Public Health Observatories) is typically the first stop for information and highlights a number of approaches, reports and methodologies, including those produced by organisations such as the Town and Country Planning Association (Reuniting health with planning), which provides guidance to planners and public health specialists.

Other valuable reference sources include:

There is a wealth of information available on approaches, methodologies and categories of health impacts although care is needed to tailor the approach to fit with the project in question.

Early engagement with health professionals in the local authority should be undertaken to ensure any preferred approaches and local issues can be reflected adequately in the assessment undertaken. However, as health becomes an area of greater formal attention in planning, more considered approaches, methodologies and more certainty and agreement on the terms used within the process will be required.


This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Dr Bryony Cunningham is a principal consultant at SKM Enviros

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close