Green infrastructure in Blackwater Valley

27th April 2012


Blackwater valley photo2

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Local government ,
  • Public sector ,
  • Construction ,
  • Biodiversity ,
  • Natural resources

Author

IEMA

Practitioners from Atkins and the Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership describe how green infrastructure can mitigate significant environmental effects

The Blackwater Valley is an area of open space, dominated by a chain of lakes, separating urban areas on the Surrey, Hampshire and Berkshire borders. Rapid urban expansion led to the degradation of the landscape and traffic congestion along the valley.

The Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership was formed in the 1960s to tackle neglect and pollution, and now works to increase the valley’s importance for biodiversity and as a recreational resource for local people. The partnership was involved throughout the construction of the Blackwater Valley Road and remains responsible for management of the green infrastructure retained and created as part of the scheme.

The Blackwater Valley Road comprises 17km of high-speed dual carriageway linking the A30 with the A31 and M3. It was conceived in the 1960s and built in four stages between 1985 and 1996 by Hampshire and Surrey County Councils. Each of the four stages was the subject of a separate environmental impact assessment (EIA); making them some of the earliest road schemes to be subject to EIA in the UK.

The EIAs recognised the road would have significant effects on ecology as a result of:

  • a net habitat loss of 38 hectares;
  • habitat fragmentation reducing the effectiveness of the valley as a wildlife corridor;
  • noise disturbance;
  • pollution of the River Blackwater from surface water run-off;
  • effects on legally protected species due to habitat loss and severance; and
  • loss of recreational facilities.

To mitigate significant effects, the two county councils purchased substantial areas of land alongside the scheme. This enabled a comprehensive package of green infrastructure measures to be designed and constructed, including:A verge that was not sown with a seed mix and allowed to regenerate naturally supports chalk grassland plant species. Credit: Tony Anderson, BVCP

  • the avoidance of existing sensitive areas where possible;
  • temporary fencing to prevent damage to adjacent areas during construction;
  • river diversions to improve riparian habitat;
  • habitat creation, resulting in an increase in water bodies and woodland of 90 hectares;
  • habitat management, such as tree removal from grassland and swamp areas;
  • translocation of heathland, aquatic and marginal vegetation and individual rare plants;
  • natural regeneration of chalk grassland communities;
  • the capture and translocation of reptiles, amphibians and fish;
  • new drainage ponds to provide wildlife habitat;
  • construction of a tunnel for roosting bats and erection of bat and bird boxes;
  • measures to protect the water quality of the river; and
  • a public footpath, doubling the area of open access land and improving the quality of an angling lake.

Monitoring exercises in 2004 and 2011 indicated the habitat creation schemes were largely successful, although some of the new habitats would take many more years to be of equal quality to those lost.

Wildfowl populations have largely benefited from the borrow pits, which provided new water bodies, and woodland bird populations use new tree belts. Translocation of aquatic plant species was successful, whereas few of the translocated grassland plants survived.

Populations of protected species have been retained including, for example, a number of common bat species. The habitat changes brought about by the road scheme also helped species not targeted by the mitigation work, such as the wildfowl that benefited from new water bodies.

However, some species have been adversely affected by the changes both directly and as a result of the changes to the overall balance of habitats within the valley. For example, attempts to translocate common spotted orchid were unsuccessful.

Three key factors were identified as being instrumental in the success of the mitigation for this scheme:

  • Ecologists worked closely with the highway engineers during design and construction of mitigation.
  • The Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership works closely with local authorities, private landowners and local community groups to manage the green infrastructure.
  • Maintaining a flexible approach to management, based on monitoring of habitats and species, helped to direct and reshape mitigation measures while continuing to focus on the original overall aims. For example, trees were removed from a number of plantations to allow naturally regenerating grassland flora to flourish.

Long before the phrase “green infrastructure” came into common use, the Blackwater Valley Road scheme retained, created and managed 117 hectares of land to provide multi-purpose benefits for people and wildlife.

This green infrastructure was placed in local authority ownership and is being managed to ensure it provides green space for local people, habitat for wildlife and mitigation against the impacts of the road.

At a time when budget constraints are likely to have an increasing influence on road and other major infrastructure schemes, it is essential that mitigation is as efficacious as possible. Green infrastructure with its multi-purpose approach to realising benefits is an excellent way of ensuring this and EIA is a robust method of identifying what mitigation is required, and can provide guidance on what should be included in the green infrastructure design.


This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Suzanne Glencross and Claire Wansbury are senior ecologists at Atkins and Steve Bailey is the manager of the Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Hosting the energy transition

Sarah Spencer on the clear case for stronger partnerships between farmers and renewable energy developers

6th June 2024

Read more

A system-level review is needed to deliver a large-scale programme of retrofit for existing buildings. Failure to do so will risk missing net-zero targets, argues Amanda Williams

31st May 2024

Read more

Chris Seekings reports from a webinar helping sustainability professionals to use standards effectively

31st May 2024

Read more

Although many organisations focus on scope 1 and 2 emissions, it is vital to factor in scope 3 emissions and use their footprint to drive business change

31st May 2024

Read more

Joe Nisbet explores the challenges and opportunities of delivering marine net gain through offshore renewables

31st May 2024

Read more

IEMA submits response to the Future Homes Standard consultation

31st May 2024

Read more

Hello and welcome to the June/July of Transform.

31st May 2024

Read more

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close