Fracking set to continue in UK

18th May 2012


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Natural resources ,
  • Energy ,
  • Generation ,
  • Conventional



Independent scientists conclude that the shale gas extraction technique is safe but set limits on drilling near water sources

New research confirms the controversial “fracking” technique used to extract shale gas triggered the minor earthquakes in Lancashire in 2011, but concludes that the process is safe to be rolled out in the UK as long as seismic hazards are assessed prior to proceeding.

The DECC-commissioned study reviewed evidence from Cuadrilla Resources, which operates the only shale gas mine in the UK, near Blackpool. The company acknowledged last November that the use of fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, at its Preese Hall mine on the Fylde coast was the likely cause of the minor seismic tremors in April and May last year, and the energy department’s independent assessment agrees.

The review team, which involved experts from Keele University and the British Geological Survey, found that it is safe to resume hydraulic fracturing provided the operators follow recommended procedures, including the introduction of a “traffic light” system that would see fracking halted if it triggers tremors of 0.5 or above on the Richter scale. Tremors measuring 2.3 and 1.5 were recorded in 2011.

Hydraulic fracturing involves the intentional injection of fluids – water, sand and chemicals – at high pressure to create new fissures and release gas deposits that have been locked in shale rock formations for millions of years.

Cuadrilla Resources welcomed the findings of the DECC report. “We are pleased that the experts have come to a clear conclusion that it is safe to allow us to resume hydraulic fracturing, following the procedures outlined in the review,” said the firm’s chief executive Mark Miller, adding that the company had already started to implement a number of the recommendations.

Campaign group Friends of the Earth criticised the review for focusing only on seismic activity. “Earth tremors aren’t the only risks associated with fracking – it’s also been linked to air and water pollution and produces gas that causes climate change. There should be a full scientific assessment of all the impacts,” commented executive director Andy Atkins.

WWF agrees. “The issue of earth tremors is an admittedly worrying distraction. The real concern is the use of fossil fuels,” it said.

The energy and climate change department has given interested parties until 29 May to comment on the review. It will then make a final decision on whether to restart hydraulic fracturing operations at Preese Hall, which have been suspended since the 2011 tremors.

Meanwhile, separate scientific research suggests that fracking should not take place within 600m of aquifers that supply drinking water. According to the study, published in Marine and Petroleum Geology, the probability of fractures extending more than 350m is just 1%, and that fracking to 2km or 3km below the surface was very unlikely to lead to contamination of water supplies, something that campaigners claim in the US, where there are extensive shale gas operations.

Professor Richard Davies, director of the energy institute at Durham University, said: “Based on our observations, we believe that it may be prudent to adopt a minimum vertical separation distance for stimulated fracturing in shale reservoirs. Constraining the maximum vertical extent of hydraulic fractures is important for the safe exploitation of unconventional hydrocarbons such as shale gas and oil.”

He confirmed that with Cuadrilla’s shale gas exploration scheme near Blackpool 3km down, it would not affect water supplies in the area, which are around 300m below the surface.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Swing voters show strong support for renewables

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

The UK’s major cities lag well behind their European counterparts in terms of public transport use. Linking development to transport routes might be the answer, argues Huw Morris

3rd April 2024

Read more

Tom Harris examines the supply chain constraints facing the growing number of interconnector projects

2nd April 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

A consortium including IEMA and the Good Homes Alliance have drafted a letter to UK government ministers expressing disappointment with the proposed Future Homes Standard.

26th February 2024

Read more

Global corporations such as Amazon and Google purchased a record 46 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind energy last year, according to BloombergNEF (BNEF).

13th February 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close