Fish kill will cost chemical company
Related Topics
Related tags
- Prosecution ,
- Pollution & Waste Management ,
- Water ,
- Corporate governance ,
- Stakeholder engagement
Author
Peterborough crown court will decide the size of the penalty to be imposed on Safapac after the chemical and packaging company pleaded guilty at a magistrates' court to polluting the River Nene in June 2012
Magistrates sent the case to the crown court because they felt that their sentencing powers, which are limited to fines of £20,000 per offence, were insufficient.
Thousands of fish died when 5,000 litres of agricultural chemicals leaked into the river from the Safapac site in Orton Southgate, Peterborough.
The court heard that some of the fish were bleached and others leapt from the water and died along a 50km stretch of the River Nene. The cost of the pollution to the Greater Wash Fishing Industries Group is estimated at more than £216,000.
The company, which specialises in wet milling, flammables, toxics and other chemical liquid blending operations, as well as packing liquid and solid substances, reported the spill to the Environment Agency.
An investigation revealed that three substances – an insecticide, a fungicide and a disinfectant that are known to be toxic to aquatic organisms and can cause burns, drowsiness or dizziness in humans – had entered a surface water drain that discharged to the river.
Anne-Lise McDonald, prosecuting for the agency, told magistrates that Safapac’s high-level risk assessment had failed to identify vandalism as a risk but that on the morning of the incident staff arrived at the site to find that taps on the storage containers had been opened and a ladder which had been used to gain entry.
Police records show that since 2010 Safapac had made five reports of criminal or anti-social behaviour directed at the company or in the immediate area involving youths causing damage to its property or trespassing.
McDonald argued that the pollution could have been prevented if the chemicals had been stored securely.
“Bulk containers containing the chemicals were stored in external bunkers near to the road. There was no bunding and no secondary containment in case of spills,” she said. McDonald also reported that there was an open drain in the storage area and another just outside.
The company says that chemicals at the Orton Southgate site are now stored in locked shipping containers.
Transform articles
Regulator publishes new code to tackle 'greenwashing'
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.
The Better Business Act would put responsibility to society and the environment on the same footing as responsibility to shareholders, explains Chris Turner
In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).
Thames Water has been fined £4m after untreated sewage escaped from sewers below London into a park and a river.
In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.
Are voluntary commitments enough to make the private sector act on waste? David Burrows explores the issues
Civil sanctions make the punishment fit the crime, says Richard Kimblin.
The UK's largest water company has been fined twice in seven days for polluting waterways in Berkshire and East Hampshire with sewage.
