EU starts action against UK over NO2
- Pollution & Waste Management ,
- Prevention & Control ,
- Local government ,
- EU ,
The European commission has launched legal proceedings against the UK for failing to cut levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution in line with legally-binding limits
The EU Directive on air quality (2008/50/EC), which entered force in June 2008, sets daily and annual limits for NO2 in populated areas. Member states had to achieve the limits by 1 January 2010 unless an extension was granted until 1 January 2015.
The commission says extensions have been agreed only with member states that have a credible and workable plan for meeting the standards within five years of the original deadline, and that the UK has failed to provide such a plan. It also noted the decision of the Supreme Court last year, which found the government was in breach of its obligations under the Directive.
The court confirmed that the air quality limits were not being met in 43 cities and regions, including London and Glasgow, and that, under Defra plans, 15 areas will continue to suffer levels of NO2 exceeding EU rules until at least 2020, while the capital would not meet the target until 2025.
The commission has sent the UK government a letter of formal notice that it is taking legal action. The government has two months to respond.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.
Over two million hectares of Brazilian rainforest could be legally converted to supply the UK with soy under a new anti-deforestation law proposed by the government, the WWF has found.
In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).
In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.