ETS compensation scheme "nonsensical"

4th January 2013

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Water ,
  • Resource extraction ,
  • Engineering and metals ,
  • Chemicals ,
  • Management/saving



Government plans to compensate manufacturers for the impacts of climate change policy on electricity prices risk rewarding firms already profiting from an oversupply of carbon credits, warns the environment audit committee

In a report examining the government’s proposals, MPs concluded that it was “nonsensical” to compensate energy-intensive firms for the impacts of the EU emissions trading system (ETS) on electricity bills when the same companies are benefitting from selling excess allowances.

“The government shouldn’t throw good money after bad by giving compensation to those already making windfall profits from the ETS, when allowances were allocated free-of-charge,” argues Joan Walley, chair of the environment audit committee (EAC).

The MPs concluded that without accurate data as to how the ETS and the planned carbon price floor will affect electricity prices – as generators pass on the costs of compliance – it was impossible for government to know how much compensation was actually necessary to ensure UK companies remain internationally competitive.

“Getting the amount of compensation wrong risks creating further distortion and poor value for money for tax payers,” states the report.

After hearing evidence from DECC, the business department, industry bodies and the committee on climate change, the EAC concludes that the government must take a flexible approach, allowing the budget to be increased or decreased in response to the levels of claims for compensation they receive.

The report also criticises the government’s failure to account for companies generating their own electricity in its proposals, arguing that firms applying for compensation must deduct the costs of self-generated electricity from their requested rebates.

While the committee states that the government’s goal of ensuring energy intensive firms remain competitive is laudable, the planned compensation schemes are a short-term approach that fails to address the most pressing barriers to companies becoming more energy-efficient, which it states are a lack of technology and investment.

It calls for the government to set out a strategy for energy-intensive sectors, identifying how much such each industry should be required to improve its efficiency in the long term and how government policies, such as decarbonisation requirements and incentives, will support these goals.

Such a strategy should not be limited to piecemeal funding, argues the committee, but should look more broadly at measure than can help the sectors to “develop in a more sustainable way”.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Swing voters show strong support for renewables

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

The UK’s major cities lag well behind their European counterparts in terms of public transport use. Linking development to transport routes might be the answer, argues Huw Morris

3rd April 2024

Read more

Tom Harris examines the supply chain constraints facing the growing number of interconnector projects

2nd April 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

A consortium including IEMA and the Good Homes Alliance have drafted a letter to UK government ministers expressing disappointment with the proposed Future Homes Standard.

26th February 2024

Read more

Global corporations such as Amazon and Google purchased a record 46 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind energy last year, according to BloombergNEF (BNEF).

13th February 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close