EIA and the search for significance

1st May 2012


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Local government ,
  • Construction

Author

IEMA

Hyder's Andrew Saunders explores how the evaluation of the significant effects in environmental impact assessment (EIA) needs to evolve

Is it true that combining the value of a receptor with the magnitude of impact determines the level of significance? Or that effects considered to be “moderate or above” are significant in the context of the EIA Regulations?

Schedule 4 of the Regulations requires an environmental statement to include: “a description of the likely significant effects of the development on the environment”, but tellingly it gives no advice as to how to derive significance or what level of significance is significant.

Deriving significance

EIA practitioners are used to combining the value of the receptor with the magnitude of impact in order to derive levels of significance and over the years have witnessed attempts to standardise this approach across topic areas with varying degrees of success (see below).

Significance Value of receptor
High Medium Low
Impact
magnitute
Major Major Major Moderate
Moderate Major Moderate Minor
Minor Moderate Minor Negligible

However, it now appears that certain guidance and best practice is moving away from this traditional “one size fits all” formulaic approach. Examples include IEMA’s own advice on climate change mitigation and EIA which states: “GHG emissions have a combined environmental effect that is approaching a scientifically defined environmental limit, as such any GHG emissions or reductions from a project might be considered to be significant.”

Interim advice notes from the Highways Agency also recognise that the standard approach to applying significance criteria may not be applicable to the assessment of particular topics, such as air quality, noise and material resources.

Recent guidance has also pointed out that matrices are not prescriptive and that EIA professionals need to be able to demonstrate a consistent and justifiable argument in making judgements on the significance of effects.

Paul Maile, from Eversheds, argues: “What is important is that the assessor sets out a transparent methodology which explains how they approach the assessment, and that they then demonstrably apply that methodology in their assessment.

“The methodology should explain how the assessor deems whether or not a significant effect will occur and as a matter of good practice it should take into account all appropriate guidance in reaching those judgements.”

The EIA Regulations and significance

Many environmental statements contain the assertion that an effect considered to be “moderate or above” is significant in the context of the EIA Regulations. As identified in IEMA’s special report into EIA practice in the UK, this is most frequently occurs in the assessment of infrastructure developments, particularly wind farms.

This view is also apparent with certain decision makers. For example, I was recently informed by one local planning authority that the council would automatically object to a project on the basis that a visual assessment had concluded that a limited number of receptors would be moderately adversely affected.

This assertion is flawed for a number of reasons:

  • It can ignore a project’s merits, including any positive environmental effects.
  • It doesn’t accord with the EIA Regulations or any other well known guidance.
  • It can lead to nervousness among assessors about concluding an effect may be of moderate adverse significance, thereby compromising objectivity.
  • It could mean that, in an attempt to reduce a moderate environmental effect to slight, other effects may worsen.
  • It may cloud the decision making and assessment process.

Tim Smith, from Berwin Leighton Paisner, warns: “Drawing a line under ‘moderate’ and excluding anything lower would tend to lead to errors in assessing cumulative effects properly. Very limited impacts when taken cumulatively can become significant.”
Furthermore, he notes: “Construing ‘significance’ is always more important at the screening stage than when drafting the environmental statement. The history of judicial reviews in this area has shown that getting the screening decision wrong always makes permissions more vulnerable than criticisms about the content of the environmental statement.”
In summary, the traditional matrix-based approach to assessing the significance of effects may no longer be applicable to many topic areas. More bespoke significance criteria are emerging and an effect of “moderate significance or above” does not necessarily mean it is significant in the context of the EIA Regulations.

Given that the EIA Regulations require an environmental statement to include “a description of the likely significant effects of the development on the environment”, if only moderate adverse effects are deemed significant they would be very short documents indeed.


This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Andrew Saunders is a technical director at Hyder

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

IEMA Impact: Shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is updating its advice note on non-technical summaries (NTS).

31st May 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close