EIA and long-distance sewer projects

25th November 2019

Chris Rochfort asks: does the withdrawal of Circular 02/99 mean long-distance sewer projects can avoid EIA in the UK?

Development carried out by the UK statutory wastewater undertakers is often 'permitted development' (Part 13, Class A and B of the Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015, and see also the Use Classes) for planning purposes. In the case of cross-country, long-distance sewers, this is namely that the development is not above ground. Nonetheless, should such a project be considered 'EIA development', all permitted development rights are lost.

A cross-country sewer development has historically been considered Schedule 2 development under section 10(l) where the area of the development is more than 1ha. The longstanding guidance on EIA, Circular 02/99, clarified that 10(l) long distance aqueducts development included water and sewerage pipelines.

However, Circular 02/99 was withdrawn by the government on 7 March 2014, and this distinction is absent from its successor, the online government guidance. This effectively allows proponents of sewer pipeline schemes to argue that they are not aqueducts and sit outside the remit of EIA. There remains potential to capture sewer development if it meets the requirements to be considered Schedule 2, 10(h) – which includes flood relief works – if it can be argued that the construction of the sewer is in response to sewer flooding.

Stantec acted as planning and environmental consultant on a recent sewer project for a UK sewerage undertaker and consulted the local minerals and waste planning authority via an informal permitted development letter. This project was more than 1ha in size and less than 5km in length, thresholds that under the now-withdrawn Circular 02/99 would have historically seen this project formally screened for EIA. The fact that the project sits outside the EIA regime (based on current guidance) was stated in the letter. However, the planning authority determined to screen the project for EIA in any event, stating: “While now out of date, [Circular 02/99] clarifies that water and sewage pipelines should be considered in a similar vein to oil/gas pipelines and long distance aqueducts, for screening purposes.“ While this planning authority did opt to screen the project, it could be argued that it was wrong to have done so – and that many authorities would have accepted the interpretation of the consultant.

It would appear that, since the withdrawal of Circular 02/99 and its replacement by the online government guidance, the installation of a long-distance sewer has ceased to become EIA development with respect to Schedule 2, 10(l). One should consider whether it is really in the spirit of the EIA Directive for the installation of, for example, a 20km large-diameter cross-country sewer to avoid the need for screening (and potentially full EIA). Such a project would only be subject to the non-planning consents regime and the self-policing internal procedures of those sewerage undertakers.

Taking into account what is stated in Article 2(a) (“Member States shall adopt all measures necessary to ensure that, before development consent is given, projects likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue, inter alia, of their nature, size or location are made subject to a requirement for development consent and an assessment with regard to their effects on the environment“), one could question whether the UK's exclusion of large sewer developments is consistent with the intention of the EIA Directive. It seems likely that the omission of major sewer projects is just an oversight associated with the transfer to online guidance on the gov.uk website, rather than a deliberate omission as part of the simplifying of the planning guidance undertaken by the coalition government between 2010-16. This gap in UK practice may in future be resolved through simply being reinstated into the guidance.

Chris Rochfort is a principal environmental consultant at Stantec.

Image credit: iStock


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

SBTi clarifies that ‘no change has been made’ to its stance on offsetting

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

Ben Goodwin reflects on policy, practice and advocacy over the past year

2nd April 2024

Read more

In 2020, IEMA and the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) jointly wrote and published A User Guide to Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. This has now been updated to include three key developments in the field.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close