EIA and environmental permitting in harmony

18th April 2012


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Pollution & Waste Management ,
  • Prevention & Control ,
  • Construction ,
  • Local government

Author

IEMA

Peter Duncan explores how environmental impact assessments (EIAs) can be better coordinated with the environmental permitting process

In March 2012, DEFRA published the results of the government’s red tape challenge review of environmental legislation, which sought the views of environment organisations and businesses. The responses collated in the report and Defra’s proposals to improve the implementation of UK legislation, indicate that the environmental permitting regime needs to be more streamlined and that the planning and permitting regimes should be better aligned for those organisations making parallel applications.

EIA is, of course, the procedure where a local planning authority assesses the potential environmental impact of certain new developments and changes to land use before they are allowed to proceed. Environmental permitting is the process by which facilities or individuals are granted permission to operate an activity which has legal restrictions placed upon it to ensure the protection of environmental quality and public health, such as those creating pollution.

Across the two activities there is significant potential for overlap, and the government’s new national planning policy framework, also published in March 2012, warns that a local planning authority should not focus on the control of processes or emissions themselves and where a planning decision has been made on a development, planning issues should not be revisited through the permitting regimes.

This approach to better coordinating EIA and environmental permitting is further emphasised in Defra’s 2011 core guidance on environmental permitting, which states that if a regulated facility also needs planning permission, it is recommended that the operator should make both applications in parallel whenever possible.

This guidance also encourages using existing data and drawing on, or attaching, other sources of information in applications, such as from EIAs, for example. Clearly, this approach will allow developers and consultants to develop EIAs and environmental permitting applications in such a way so as to avoid unnecessary duplication.

Examples of industries with potential projects requiring both an environmental permitting application and an EIA include: energy from waste activities, intensive farming, wastewater treatment and the manufacture of food and drink. The need for both environmental permitting and EIA in each of these cases is dependent on defined thresholds; closer alignment of these thresholds would allow for a greater level of synchronisation across the two regimes.

In terms of environmental focus, EIA and environmental permitting differ in scope, with the permitting regime’s focus on well-defined environmental issues primarily on the use raw materials, pollution and waste management. Meanwhile, EIA tends to have a broader perspective, considering, for example, land-use, biodiversity, and historic and cultural heritage.

While there are fundamental differences that justify the need for two distinct but complementary procedures, there are strong similarities between both regimes. Aspects of development examined by both EIA and permitting include:

• Alternative development options.

• Assessment of the potential effects on:

• Environmental monitoring

There is clearly considerable scope for the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Environment Agency to explore the extent that common information can be carried from the planning portal to the environmental permitting application form.

In conclusion, there is an obvious impetus to both streamline and build on the common links between EIA and environmental permitting to develop a more harmonious approach in the application process.

The Environmental Services Association, for example, a representative body of the UK's waste management industry, responded to Defra’s red tape challenge review stating: “We particularly welcome the proposals to streamline environmental permitting and increase its alignment with the planning regime.”
The environment department’s proposals, such as the development of the planning portal, will make it much easier for applicants to make simultaneous planning and permitting applications by allowing for common information to be shared across both regimes, and that can only be a good thing.


This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Peter Duncan is a project technical lead at MWH UK. [email protected]

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close