EIA and ecology - a collaborative approach

16th April 2013

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Natural resources ,
  • Biodiversity ,
  • Ecosystems ,
  • Consultancy



Halcrow's Liza Hollinghurst describes the approach taken to ecology and environmental impact assessment (EIA) on the Cotswold Canals Regeneration Project

Led by the Cotswold Canals Partnership (CCP), the Cotswold Canals Regeneration Project (CCRP) aims to restore two of Gloucestershire’s canals to navigation: the Stroudwater Navigation and the Thames and Severn Canal; collectively known as the “Cotswold Canals” and extending over 58km.

Opened in 1779, the Stroudwater Navigation extended inland from the village of Framilode, on the banks of the River Severn, to Wallbridge in Stroud. This was followed by the Thames and Severn Canal in 1789, which continued the canal network from Wallbridge to the River Thames at Lechlade.

The development of the railway network ultimately contributed towards the demise of the canals, with the closure of the Thames and Severn Canal in 1933 and the Stroudwater Navigation in 1954.

This abandonment led to the disintegration of the canals, with them becoming either in-filled and incorporated into the expansion of the local built environment, or gradually recolonised by aquatic and terrestrial flora.

The project

The CCRP project team comprises Stroud District Council and their partners, including Halcrow Group. A phased approach is being implemented. Phase 1a commenced in 2009 and focused on the restoration of a 6km corridor, comprising bridges, locks, bunds and in-filled sections.

The corridor was divided up into 17 application sites and an EIA undertaken for each. Planning permission was granted, with specific conditions stipulated as required for individual reaches. The construction environmental management plan (CEMP) for each application site made use of the information gained through the EIA process.

Due to the complexity of Phase 1a and the EIA process, Halcrow’s EIA coordinator and ecologist employed an integrated and collaborative approach to assessing the ecological receptors for each site.

The EIA coordinator and ecologist first undertook an ecological scoping visit along the entire Phase 1a corridor. They were able to discuss the known, and potential, biodiversity and conservation value of the corridor in relation to the proposed design. This was a valuable exercise as it provided the EIA coordinator with an initial appraisal of:

  • the ecological receptors present or likely to be present;
  • the type of species surveys likely to be required and their timing; and
  • the potential ecological impacts associated with the proposed construction phase that would require tailored mitigation measures.

While a joint site visit by the EIA coordinator and the project ecologist is not usually conducted, in this case it was deemed useful owing to the significant ecological impacts likely during construction.

This collaborative approach continued throughout the ecological appraisal and subsequent species surveys, which identified the potential for protected species to inhabit the canals and their riparian habitats and other sensitive receptors in close proximity.

The ecologist also ensured the EIA coordinator was aware of which species surveys were to be undertaken, their optimal survey season and the survey findings.

The following ecological issues were identified:

  • active badger outlier setts were recorded at two separate sites;
  • bat surveys at one site recorded eight bat species; four of which are species of principal importance under section 41 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006; and
  • evidence of otter activity at three separate sites.

The ecologists undertaking the species surveys also prepared detailed mitigation measures which were incorporated into the CEMPs.

Regular liaison between the EIA coordinator and designated ecological clerk of works (ECoW) for Phase 1a is also being undertaken. The ECoW has been conducting weekly visits of six construction sites since 2011. After each visit, the ECoW prepares a report which is circulated to external stakeholders and the project team, including the EIA coordinator.

This communication has ensured that the EIA coordinator is aware that the ecological conditions in the individual CEMPs are being followed and monitored, and that all sensitive receptors are adequately protected.

Ecological impact assessments

The collaborative and integrated approach during Phase 1a has delivered ecological impact assessments (EcIAs) that have supported each application site throughout the planning process.

These EcIAs have assessed the biodiversity and conservation value at each site, recommending where necessary mitigation measures and ecological enhancements that are appropriate to the locality, habitats, and species present.

These measures have included:

  • the permanent closure of two outlier setts, under licence by Natural England;
  • a landscaped planting scheme to enhance existing habitats for badgers;
  • the creation of a wildlife pond;
  • monitoring known areas of otter activity during the interim and construction phase;
  • not undertaking any night-time work to mitigate for potential otter presence;
  • monitoring breeding waterfowl prior to any in-channel works;
  • installing 60 bird and bats boxes through grant funding from the Big Lottery Fund's “Awards for all” scheme; and
  • installing a range of species-specific bat boxes at a site with significant bat presence.

The EIA coordinator and ecologist/ECoW roles have been occupied by the same people since 2010, which has helped maintain continuity for the project team and the contractors appointed to different Phase 1a sites.

This continuity also benefits the client with the EIA coordinator and ecologist/ECoW having a comprehensive knowledge of the project, and being able to pool their respective skill sets to resolve any issues. This successful approach has also provided the client with an example of best practice that can be used as a model throughout the remaining phases of the CCRP.

This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Liza Hollinghurst, MIEEM MEECW, is an environmental engineer at Halcrow Group (a CH2M Hill company)


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close