EIA and conserving special places

17th October 2013

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Construction ,
  • Consultancy ,
  • Ecosystems ,
  • Biodiversity



Robert Harvey, from RPS, examines the role of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in conserving areas of special scientific, historic or environmental interest

Since the dawn of civilisation, people have identified and celebrated special places.

We do not know why our Bronze Age forebears hauled bluestones from Pembrokeshire to Salisbury Plain, but that herculean feat surely demonstrates they held the location at which Stonehenge was built to be a special place.

The Ancient Greeks gave us the first known list of special places; the seven wonders of the world, masterworks of human ingenuity and architecture. Today we recognise more special places than ever; from listed buildings and scheduled monuments to sites of special scientific interest (SSSI), special areas of conservation and world heritage sites.

The need to preserve many of these places has only been recognised relatively recently. Shakespeare’s last house in Stratford-on-Avon was demolished in 1759. Until the 19th century, the stone circle at Avebury (Wiltshire) and Hadrian’s Wall (Northumberland), both of which are now world heritage sites, were regarded by local people as handy sources of building stone. As recently as 1994, a motorway was constructed through Twyford Down (Hampshire), now part of the South Downs National Park.

So what makes a place special? And what can we learn from past radical shifts in society’s perceptions about their conservation for their future management?

One lesson that could easily be drawn is that what is disregarded today may be highly regarded by future generations and that we must preserve for posterity everything that might possibly be of value. However, this thinking seems not only unrealistic but flawed.

EIA practitioners often divide environmental assets into “natural” and “cultural”. By and large these categories are subject to different designations, separate regulations and are protected by their own government agencies. Closer examination reveals that there is no neat division.

Often, it is the harmonious blend of natural and human influences that lifts a special place above the ordinary. Removed from its setting, a monument would lose much of its significance. Would the Cornish tidal island of St Michael’s Mount (an SSSI) be a celebrated feature, were it not for an abbey and castle (grade 1 listed buildings) being built on it?

Would Wiltshire’s wooded valley from which springs the River Stour be well known, had it not been transformed into an artificial lake surrounded by the world’s finest, and grade 1 registered, landscape gardens, Stourhead?

Similarly, wildlife sites depend on management. The rich floral diversity of an unimproved lowland hay meadow depends on sensitive agriculture and a suitable grazing regime. Most wildlife sites would lose their special interest if human management were to cease.

In truth, every part of Britain is the product of a multilayered historical landscape. More than anywhere else in the world, Britain excels in this integration of man and nature.

The intensity of land use in Britain is the result of our island’s long history and dense population. Another consequence is our well-developed land-use planning system. Its purpose is to direct appropriate development to the right places.

Accordingly, special places are well protected; as well as planning consents and environmental impact assessments we have, amongst others: listed building consents; scheduled monument consents; Habitats Regulations assessments; and Water Framework Directive assessments.

This amounts to a rigorous system of environmental protection, whose intentions are laudable. However, I wonder whether there is a danger of stifling creativity of the type they seek to protect. If the 18th century owner of Stourhead estate had required a Water Framework Directive assessment, would the famous lake and gardens ever have been built?

One of today’s greatest environmental challenges is meeting future energy needs while reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Accommodating land-hungry renewable energy installations, such as wind farms, within our green and pleasant land sets the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions against preservation of existing landscape character.

The prospect of new industrial development on rural hillsides engenders strongly-held and legitimate opinions on both sides. However, if turn the clock back two centuries and that is what happened when iron and steel making came to Blaenavon in South Wales, and today the legacy of that industrialisation is a world heritage site.

Landscapes evolve. Habitats and gardens evolve. Even buildings evolve. There are many factors at work: ecological succession; changes in agricultural practices; competition for water; aging structures; increases in visitor numbers; and the future effects of climate change. Successful conservation must allow for change.

Managers of the coastal environment already recognise this. Rising sea levels and coastal erosion inevitably bring change. Our cherished coastal landscapes are the product of natural processes; as they were created, so they shall evolve and ultimately be destroyed. To resist this would result in ever more revetments, groynes and sea walls, which would inevitably destroy the essence of those places. We cannot preserve the status quo.

Where does this inevitability and desirability of change leave EIA practitioners? In an ever-more globalised world, many aspects of life seem to get more similar wherever you go. As this trend gathers pace, it becomes ever more important to retain local distinctiveness. That means conserving special places, whether the subject of formal designations or not. But at the same time we must embrace change and take a long view.

Perhaps we should be asking: “What was this place like a century ago and what will it be like a century from now?”

A proposed new landscape feature may seem strange now, but it could be a future icon. The evolution of a habitat may lead to some species being lost at that site but there may be an overall, sustainable increase in biodiversity.

Environmental statements are usually proficient at capturing detail, but I wonder whether they always see the big picture. We must gather and analyse evidence, but also raise our sights to see opportunities alongside constraints.

As EIA practitioners, we should sometimes look beyond designations and seek the spirit of special places, whether it is cultural, ecological, scientific, aesthetic or a serendipitous combination of them all. If we can conserve and enhance a sense of place, our work will have been worthwhile.

This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Robert Harvey, BA ARPS AFIAP, is an associate with RPS


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Is the sea big enough?

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

The UK’s major cities lag well behind their European counterparts in terms of public transport use. Linking development to transport routes might be the answer, argues Huw Morris

3rd April 2024

Read more

Tom Harris examines the supply chain constraints facing the growing number of interconnector projects

2nd April 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

A consortium including IEMA and the Good Homes Alliance have drafted a letter to UK government ministers expressing disappointment with the proposed Future Homes Standard.

26th February 2024

Read more

Global corporations such as Amazon and Google purchased a record 46 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind energy last year, according to BloombergNEF (BNEF).

13th February 2024

Read more

Three-quarters of UK adults are concerned about the impact that climate change will have on their bills, according to polling commissioned by Positive Money.

13th February 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close