EIA and archaeological risk management

16th July 2012

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Management ,
  • Stakeholder engagement ,
  • Business & Industry



Rachel Morse from Mouchel describe how to manage the risks posed to a development by the potential discovery of archaeological remains

Buried archaeological remains rarely prevent development, but it can come as a surprise and can cause delays to the overall development programme and bring unplanned costs if not managed from the early stages of any scheme.

Known unknowns

The risk that the archaeological resource poses to development lies not in what is known, but what is unknown.

The environmental impact assessment (EIA) process provides the framework within which the likely significant effects of a scheme on known cultural heritage resources are identified and reported in the environmental statement.

The EIA process does not, however, assess archaeological risk or a means of managing that risk through the EIA process and into construction.

Previous experience of major infrastructure schemes demonstrates that the risk can be significantly reduced by acknowledging the unknown and making contingencies for unexpected discoveries by developing a cultural heritage strategy in parallel with the EIA process.

The strategy should recognise that there will be impacts on known cultural heritage resources and focuse on the adoption of design measures with a view to reducing the order of impact.

It should also recognise that unknown resources will be at risk and should seek to establish a framework for approaching that risk throughout the planning, assessment, design and implementation of the proposed scheme.

The intention should be that the principal parties responsible for ensuring the cultural heritage resource is conserved and protected can have confidence that appropriate and effective measures are being adopted throughout the process.

Guiding principles

The strategy should set out the guiding principles for managing impacts on cultural heritage resources during the development of the design through to construction.

The principles on which the strategy should be founded are that:

  • the collective cultural heritage resource, including historic buildings, historic landscapes and archaeology, is protected from disturbance from construction activities as far as is reasonably practicable;
  • the effects of impacts on cultural heritage are mitigated in accordance with good practice guidance; and
  • investigations and mitigation measures are informed by a clearly focused research strategy that is cost and time effective.

It is helpful to include in the strategy a timeframe demonstrating the key stages in the archaeological and risk management processes, aligned with the important phases of the project from the assessment of a proposal through to early construction.

More investigation

It is an inevitable consequence of the process, and the powers available to the developer relating to access, that levels of information on any cultural heritage resource becomes more detailed as planning, design and implementation progresses.

The strategy should reflect this and explain at which stages investigations and information can be obtained with certainty based on the developer’s powers.

It can also recognise that permission can be sought from landowners to enable parts of the investigative process to be progressed prior to construction. It should, however, acknowledge that some of the activities are less likely to be undertaken prior to the developer being given rights of access by virtue of a consented scheme.

The key difficulty in archaeological assessment arises where the desk-based investigations progress to a point where intrusive investigation is required prior to the scheme being granted approval and landowners are reluctant to grant access for works which will disturb the ground.

The result is that the establishment of the status of the cultural heritage resource; the recognition of impacts that will result from the construction of the scheme; and the identification of appropriate mitigation measures, often progresses beyond the assessment and into construction phase.

While undertaking intrusive investigative works during the construction phase is not ideal, when it is necessary the work can be programmed in conjunction with the main construction contractor during preparation of the detailed construction programme.

This ensures that areas of the site subject to the early stages of construction are investigated first and any necessary subsequent archaeological works can be agreed and progressed to mitigate potential impacts on the construction programme.

It is not possible to totally eliminate archaeological risk and there is always a possibility that unexpected discoveries will occur.

The potential risks can, however, be substantially reduced and controlled by developing a suite of measures to reduce uncertainty and to allow contingencies for how to deal with residual uncertainty.

The preparation of a cultural heritage strategy enables the financial, commercial and programme risks caused by archaeology to be appropriately managed.

This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Rachel Morse is a principal heritage consultant at Mouchel


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close