Defra consults on plan for biodiversity offsets

5th September 2013

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Local government ,
  • Construction ,
  • Consultancy ,
  • Ecosystems ,
  • Biodiversity



Developers will be able to choose to offset the impacts of their projects on biodiversity under proposals to incorporate offsetting into the planning regime in England

In a consultation launched today (5 September), the environment department has outlined its plans to create a biodiversity offsetting system in England.

Under the government’s preferred plans, developers would be able to choose to offset a project’s impacts on the local environment and wildlife, by improving the quality of a habitat elsewhere, rather than have it become a mandatory requirement.

“Offsetting is an exciting opportunity to look at how we can improve the environment as well as grow the economy,” commented environment secretary Owen Paterson.

“We want to hear from developer and wildlife groups alike on how we can simplify the existing planning process, while enhancing our natural environment. There is no reason why wildlife and development can’t flourish side-by-side.”

In a green paper accompanying the online consultation, the government confirms that it will only back a biodiversity-offsetting system that “achieves net gain for biodiversity” and improve planning requirements related to biodiversity. The aim is to create a system that is “quicker, cheaper and more certain for developers”, says Defra.

It proposes to incorporate offsetting into the existing planning regime. Under the plans, local authorities would consider the biodiversity value of land within strategic environmental assessments and then assess development applications to determine whether they adequately minimise harm to biodiversity, or whether any additional steps should be taken.

The government’s preferred option is for offsets to be voluntary - or a "fully permissive approach", but this has been criticised by Barry Gardiner, Labour’s shadow minister for the environment.

“Offsetting could improve the planning system, improve conditions for wildlife and avoid extra costs to businesses," he said. "But the government’s preferred option is for a 'fully permissive approach' that their own officials have told them will cost the most money, achieve the least growth, and is the most likely to damage Britain’s wildlife and ecosystems.”

The government is, however, also seeking stakeholder views on whether the planning system should require offsetting for applications above a certain size. “This would have an effect on the number of projects that need to undertake a biodiversity offsetting assessment and the amount of offsets required. The aim would be to ensure a sufficient market for offsets,” says the green paper.

The consultation also asks for feedback on how best to measure the biodiversity value of different habitats. It describes the matrix being used in offsetting pilot schemes, which allocates habitats with a value in “biodiversity units” in relation to the quality and “distinctiveness” of the environment, but acknowledges that it could be improved “to reflect species and improve the way it assesses habitat condition”, for example.

Biodiversity offsets will apply to protected species, and government plans to apply the principle first to great crested newts.

The consultation closes on 7 November, and Defra says it will publish its final proposals for biodiversity offsets and by the end of 2013.

The consultation was published alongside the government’s official response to the Ecosystems Market Taskforce report which advocated the use of biodiversity offsets. Within the response Defra pledges to work with the Financial Reporting Council and to publish a roadmap next spring on incorporating natural capital into business accounting and reports.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

The biophilic effect

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

A hangover from EU legislation, requirements on the need for consideration of nutrient neutrality for developments on many protected sites in England were nearly removed from the planning system in 2023.

2nd April 2024

Read more

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

All major housing developments in England will be required by law to deliver at least a 10% increase in biodiversity under new rules that came into force today.

12th February 2024

Read more

As we approach the 40th anniversary of the Born Free Foundation, co-founder Will Travers OBE tells Chris Seekings how a new approach to conservation is needed to end animal suffering

1st February 2024

Read more

Ajirioghene Samuel looks at some exciting tree-planting initiatives, offering nature-based solutions to climate change impacts

1st February 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close