Defra consults on plan for biodiversity offsets
- Local government ,
- Construction ,
- Consultancy ,
- Ecosystems ,
Developers will be able to choose to offset the impacts of their projects on biodiversity under proposals to incorporate offsetting into the planning regime in England
In a consultation launched today (5 September), the environment department has outlined its plans to create a biodiversity offsetting system in England.
Under the government’s preferred plans, developers would be able to choose to offset a project’s impacts on the local environment and wildlife, by improving the quality of a habitat elsewhere, rather than have it become a mandatory requirement.
“Offsetting is an exciting opportunity to look at how we can improve the environment as well as grow the economy,” commented environment secretary Owen Paterson.
“We want to hear from developer and wildlife groups alike on how we can simplify the existing planning process, while enhancing our natural environment. There is no reason why wildlife and development can’t flourish side-by-side.”
In a green paper accompanying the online consultation, the government confirms that it will only back a biodiversity-offsetting system that “achieves net gain for biodiversity” and improve planning requirements related to biodiversity. The aim is to create a system that is “quicker, cheaper and more certain for developers”, says Defra.
It proposes to incorporate offsetting into the existing planning regime. Under the plans, local authorities would consider the biodiversity value of land within strategic environmental assessments and then assess development applications to determine whether they adequately minimise harm to biodiversity, or whether any additional steps should be taken.
The government’s preferred option is for offsets to be voluntary - or a "fully permissive approach", but this has been criticised by Barry Gardiner, Labour’s shadow minister for the environment.
“Offsetting could improve the planning system, improve conditions for wildlife and avoid extra costs to businesses," he said. "But the government’s preferred option is for a 'fully permissive approach' that their own officials have told them will cost the most money, achieve the least growth, and is the most likely to damage Britain’s wildlife and ecosystems.”
The government is, however, also seeking stakeholder views on whether the planning system should require offsetting for applications above a certain size. “This would have an effect on the number of projects that need to undertake a biodiversity offsetting assessment and the amount of offsets required. The aim would be to ensure a sufficient market for offsets,” says the green paper.
The consultation also asks for feedback on how best to measure the biodiversity value of different habitats. It describes the matrix being used in offsetting pilot schemes, which allocates habitats with a value in “biodiversity units” in relation to the quality and “distinctiveness” of the environment, but acknowledges that it could be improved “to reflect species and improve the way it assesses habitat condition”, for example.
Biodiversity offsets will apply to protected species, and government plans to apply the principle first to great crested newts.
The consultation closes on 7 November, and Defra says it will publish its final proposals for biodiversity offsets and by the end of 2013.
The consultation was published alongside the government’s official response to the Ecosystems Market Taskforce report which advocated the use of biodiversity offsets. Within the response Defra pledges to work with the Financial Reporting Council and to publish a roadmap next spring on incorporating natural capital into business accounting and reports.
Demand for fossil fuels will peak by 2025 if all national net-zero pledges are implemented in full and on time, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has forecast.
The Green Homes Grant is set to deliver only a fraction of the jobs and improvements intended, leading to calls for more involvement from local authorities in future schemes.
COVID-19 recovery packages have largely focused on protecting, rather than transforming, existing industries, and have been a “lost opportunity” for speeding up the global energy transition.
Half of the world's 40 largest listed oil and gas companies will have to slash their production by at least 50% by the 2030s to align with the goals of the Paris Agreement, new analysis has found.
None of England’s water and sewerage companies achieved all environmental expectations for the period 2015 to 2020, the Environment Agency has revealed. These targets included the reduction of total pollution incidents by at least one-third compared with 2012, and for incident self-reporting to be at least 75%.
The UK’s pipeline for renewable energy projects could mitigate 90% of job losses caused by COVID-19 and help deliver the government’s ‘levelling up’ agenda. That is according to a recent report from consultancy EY-Parthenon, which outlines how the UK’s £108bn “visible pipeline” of investible renewable energy projects could create 625,000 jobs.
Billions of people worldwide have been unable to access safe drinking water and sanitation in their homes during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a progress report from the World Health Organisation focusing on the UN’s sixth Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 6) – to “ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all by 2030”.