Deal or no deal?

19th October 2012

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Property ,
  • Procurement ,
  • Mitigation



Following the launch this month of the green deal, Paul Suff questions if it will really provide the energy-efficiency savings needed

An “unprecedented energy-efficiency programme” that will bring “jobs, growth and opportunities” right across the UK was how the then energy secretary Chris Huhne described the green deal when announcing plans for the scheme at the Liberal Democrat party conference in 2010.

The green deal is now live and the first deals are expected to be signed next January. The scheme allows the cost of installing energy-efficiency measures to be financed through a charge attached to a property’s electricity meter. According to the government, the green deal provides a market solution to a market failure: the reluctance of householders and businesses to invest in energy efficiency because of the initial costs.

In the non-domestic sector, DECC expects the green deal to appeal mainly to small and medium-sized companies, as larger firms tend to fund refurbishments from cash reserves. Overall, the energy department estimates the net present value of taking up the green deal at £1.1 billion for the business sector, with carbon equivalent savings of about 910,000 tonnes by 2022.

Will these projected savings materialise? It’s unlikely. Although the green deal removes the financial barrier to installing energy-efficiency measures by removing the up-front cost, green deal loans will attract interest. And, unlike domestic deals, fixed interest rates will not be available for non-domestic green deals.

As the Federation of Small Businesses has warned, commercial rates of interest, coupled with rising energy prices, mean that cost savings will not be seen until the initial capital is paid back – possibly as long as 20 years.

But money isn’t the only potential barrier. Small companies are just as likely as householders to resist investing in efficiency measures such as better insulation, improved lighting and heating controls, and new boilers, despite the potential savings, because of the time, effort and disruption involved.

The green deal is great in theory, but the scheme is likely to require substantial improvement if it is to be the game changer the UK desperately needs to reduce energy consumption in buildings.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

EU and UK citizens fear net-zero delivery deficit

Support for net zero remains high across the UK and the EU, but the majority of citizens don't believe that major emitters and governments will reach their climate targets in time.

16th May 2024

Read more

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

Taxing the extraction of fossil fuels in the world’s most advanced economies could raise $720bn (£575bn) by 2030 to support vulnerable countries facing climate damages, analysis has found.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close