Construction firms top final CRC league table

26th February 2013


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Water ,
  • Transport ,
  • Retail and wholesale ,
  • Local government ,
  • Health

Author

IEMA

BAM Construction and Skanska have been named the best performing participants in the second year of the carbon reduction commitment energy efficiency scheme (CRC), but questions have been raised over the ranking's calculations

Following a four-month delay, the Environment Agency has today (26 February 2013) published the second and final league table ranking the performance of the 2,097 CRC participants.

BAM Construction was revealed as the best performing organisation, after cutting both its absolute CO2 output and its emissions per unit of turnover, as calculated under the CRC, by more than 64% compared with the first reporting year. Fellow construction firm, Skanska was ranked second, with Carillion and Costain also appearing in the top 12.

The UK arm of communications company Motorola Solutions finished out the top three having reduced its total carbon emissions from 8,040 tonnes to 2,997 tonnes.

The highest ranked public sector organisation was Manchester’s City Council, which was ranked fourth, followed by the NHS Blood and Transplant service in sixth and the department for communities and local government, which cut its CO2 emissions by more than 70% year-on-year.

Meanwhile, Kerry Holdings, which makes ingredients and flavourings for the food sector, was ranked in last place, after its absolute emissions, as measured by the CRC, grew from 1 tonne of CO2 to 352 tonnes (a 35,100% increase). Other poor performers in the table include ING Bank, whose absolute emissions more than doubled year-on-year, and Kodak, which was ranked 2091 following a 255% increase on CO2 per unit of turnover.

While the first CRC performance league table, published in November 2011, ranked participants only on the early actions taken to improve energy efficiency (certifying against the Carbon Trust standard, for example) the second year’s scoring is based on a combination of early action measures, reductions in absolute emissions and cuts to emissions per unit of turnover or revenue expenditure.

However, questions have been raised about the methodology adopted by the Environment Agency in calculating the rankings, with the top ranked performer refusing to support it.

“The 64% reduction cited in the league table is not accurate in real terms and represents a magnitude of reduction that no organisation could expect to achieve without significant operational changes,” confirmed a spokesperson from BAM Construction.

“The largest source of reductions in the league table is in fuel use. Excluding gas oil, we have managed to reduce emissions by around 2,500 tonnes of CO2. This would be equivalent to around a 17% reduction in absolute and normalised emissions.”

David Symons, director at environmental and engineering consultancy WSP, agreed: “It’s right to celebrate the high performers, like Skanska and BAM, but also to recognise that many of the high or low scorers could be due to structural changes, such as selling sites and buildings as much as strong energy improvements.

“Taking the anomalies out, the league table shows a mixed picture on energy performance. Most encouraging is that companies show an average 7% improvement in carbon emissions per unit of turnover. Less good news is that only 500 out of the 2000 companies actually reduced their emissions in real terms last year.”

The complete league table, including emissions data for each of the participants, is available on the Environment Agency website, but it will be the last such table. The energy department confirmed at the end of 2012, that the performance league table was to be scrapped in a suite of measures designed to simplify the scheme for participants.

According to Ben Wielgus, lead advisor on the CRC at accountancy giant KPMG (ranked 38th), the loss of the league table will make comparing participants performance more difficult.

“Many will not mourn the passing of the CRC league table. However, it is important to remember that it was one of the first attempts ever to nationally rank more than 2,000 diverse and varied organisations,” he commented.

“Without a league table, the reputational driver from the CRC will be severely diminished and there to be a more varied set of responses to the planned approach of comparing organisations in the scheme based on an intensity measure that they select. This will rely heavily on the industries themselves to do the comparisons.”

Meanwhile IEMA’s policy director, Martin Baxter, reminded firms that they will still have to submit performance data in future and, with the delays to the publication of the league table due to concerns regarding the accuracy of the data reported, asked what the Environment Agency is doing to improve the quality of data.

“Accurate data not only underpins the CRC as an environmental tax and affects how much money companies will pay for their CRC allowances, but also is critical for the reputation of the scheme, and to ensure a level playing field between scheme participants,” he said. “Although there are provisions within the regulations for fines for inaccurately reporting data, what action will the Environment Agency be taking to ensure companies comply?”

Baxter also warned that the CRC scheme continued to fail the business test for long-term policy certainty.

“Setting a carbon price until 2016 for CRC is a step in the right direction in giving business an allowance price against which they can invest in energy efficiency. However, a further review planned for 2016, with the stated intent of removing the tax element, undermines the ability for business to optimise investment for the long-term,” he said.

“We urgently need a long term, consistent policy framework to provide businesses with the confidence to invest in low-carbon and energy-efficient improvements.”

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Four in five shoppers willing to pay ‘sustainability premium’

Despite cost-of-living concerns, four-fifths of shoppers are willing to pay more for sustainably produced or sourced goods, a global survey has found.

16th May 2024

Read more

One in five UK food businesses are not prepared for EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) coming into force in December, a new survey has uncovered.

16th May 2024

Read more

Each person in the UK throws a shocking 35 items of unwanted clothes and textiles into general waste every year on average, according to a new report from WRAP.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close