Combating air pollution in Botswana

16th March 2012


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Resource extraction ,
  • Ecosystems ,
  • Biodiversity ,
  • Air

Author

IEMA

Bethan Tuckett-Jones and Hanspeter Tomschi share their experiences of completing an air quality impact assessment on a mine in Botswana

The BCL mine complex, situated near the town of Selebi Phikwe in eastern Botswana, includes both deep mining and smelting operations. It has been producing copper-nickel matte from sulphidic ore since the early 1970s.

Emissions to air occur at all stages in the process and, each year, the complex emits more sulphur dioxide (SO2) than whole of the UK.

Selebi Phikwe area is striving to diversify its economy away from mining, with agriculture and tourism identified as prime sections for development. However, the poor quality of the local environment is a major factor impeding this transition.

A consortium led by Parsons Brinckerhoff was funded through the European Development Fund to provide the BCL mine and Botswana’s government with relevant technical advice, based on environmental impact assessment (EIA) of air quality, to make an informed decision on how to reduce pollution from the smelting operations.

The objective was to:

  • review available environmental management data and produce an air emissions inventory for the mine
  • assess the current impacts of the mine using dispersion modelling and
  • identify technologies for emissions control and markets for the by-products

Prior to smelting, the principal emissions to air from the mining complex are the carcinogenic nickel-rich dusts arising from the crushing of the mined ore. During the smelting process off-gases are discharged to air and consist of 20% SO2, a gas which, in high concentrations, is harmful to both human health and the natural environment.

The EIA process enabled us to demonstrate, beyond reasonable doubt, the link between emissions from the mine and the near complete degradation of the vegetation downwind of the facility and to quantify the emissions reductions required to prevent environmental damage and harm to health both on and off the site.

Methodology

We first prepared an emissions inventory based on a mass balance reconciliation of the sulphur and nickel content of the process raw materials and the final product (nickel matte).

Essentially, with no significant emissions to media other than air, emissions could be estimated by assuming that all sulphur in the mined ore was oxidised and emitted as sulphur dioxide (the final product has no sulphur content), whereas the difference between the nickel content of the input ore and the output matte was assumed to be emitted as nickel.

We then audited the mine’s environmental monitoring programme and commissioned further emissions monitoring to apportion the total emissions between potential sources. Finally, we modelled the air quality impacts of the emissions using the ADMS 4 model.

Previous studies of the BCL complex had been criticised for failing to provide conclusive evidence of the mine’s impact on the environment. While the dispersion model results in our study were consistent with the available ambient air-quality monitoring data, a formal verification of the model was not possible due to the limited range of data.

It was therefore necessary to use alternative approaches to ensure stakeholder engagement. We did this by:

  • using all available environmental data, including bio-monitoring, to indirectly verify the modelling
  • demonstrating the model was replicating the daily cycle of the real-world behaviour of the emissions, and
  • presenting the findings in a stakeholder workshop ahead of the final project report.

Model results

The ability of the dispersion model to reproduce the observed behaviour of the plume and exposure to air pollution was demonstrated through a time-lapse photographic record of the plume, coupled with coincident dispersion model output (see examples below). The model’s predictions accurately replicated the timing of the grounding of the plume and concentrations consistent with the symptoms being experienced by individuals in the area.

Examples of correlation between time-lapse photographic record and modelled impacts

At 0800 hours, the plume remains lofted and coherent for some distance downwind. With only weak turbulence mixing the plume vertically, impacts on the ground do not occur until >5km from the stack and are negligible.

By 1400, the average wind speed falls to near calm conditions, fumigation occurs and as the turbulence mixes the plume to the ground rapidly it loses its coherent structure and the point of maximum impact moves to within a few hundred metres of the stack. On site, throat and eye symptoms associated with acute exposure to SO2 are readily apparent.

Impacts on vegetation

Exposure of vegetation to SO2 can result in leaf damage and reduced plant growth. These effects were readily apparent in the variability in the health of vegetation in the vicinity of BCL mine.

Mopane woodland (below picture A) grows only in southern Africa and is important for numerous animal species because of its nutritional value. Degradation of the Mopane vegetation is apparent downwind of the stack (pictures B, C and D), and is increasingly severe as the distance to the stack decreases.

Analysis revealed a consistent exponential decay with distance from the stack which is strongly indicative of a link between the sulphates in the vegetation and the dispersion of emissions from the BCL main stack.

There was also good correlation between the concentration of SO2 in air and reduced growth and foliar damage (pictures B, C and D). Reduced growth is readily apparent at concentrations of SO2 in air of around 100µg/m3 – compare picture B with healthy vegetation in A. Data from locations upwind of the prevailing wind from the stack indicate the EU critical level for SO2 of 20µg/m3 is appropriate.


Figure 1: Examples of Mopane vegetation 40km north of the stack (A) and at distances of 15km (D), 5km (C) and 2km (B) respectively downwind of the stack downwind


Recommendations

To meet World Health Organisation guidelines for the protection of health and ecosystems an immediate 95% reduction of SO2 and nickel emission is required.

Further research concluded it was feasible to capture SO2 and use it to produce sulphuric acid, which could be sold meaning the environmental enhancement could be achieved at a neutral cost.

It was also recommended that a health impact assessment be conducted to consider the health of the Selebi Phikwe population from a holistic view point.


This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Bethan Tuckett-Jones is head of air quality, environment ay Parsons Brinckerhoff. Hanspeter Tomschi formerly worked for Harress Pickel Consult GMBH as a consultant on the project.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

IEMA Impact: Shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is updating its advice note on non-technical summaries (NTS).

31st May 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close