Changes to the fourth round of adaptation reporting

31st May 2023

Shutterstock 2124117584

Related Topics



The Climate Change Act 2008 put in place the Adaptation Reporting Power (ARP), which has now been going for three rounds, in five-year cycles.

The fourth round is coming up and the government is consulting on whether to make changes to the reporting requirements.

Organisations are asked to report on how they manage climate risk. Reports cover the impacts of climate change on their organisation, how they intend to adapt and their progress on adaptation.

Initially the timings were not in line with the timetable for the UK Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA), with the result that the CCRAs did not have access to all the latest evidence. Less than 5% of ARP reports in round three were received in time to inform the third CCRA. It seems likely that one of the changes will be an amendment of the timetable so that CCRAs will reflect the most up-to-date positions of the reporting organisations.

For the first round, it was mandatory to report, while, for the second and third rounds, it was not. The government is consulting on whether to make reporting mandatory rather than voluntary for the fourth and future rounds. It seems likely that it will, the evidence being that not all organisations will report when reporting is voluntary. This makes it impossible to know whether these organisations and the core infrastructure they run are adequately taking the need for adaptation into account as they plan. Given that these organisations are critical for the functioning of society, and with recent climate events proving that adaptation needs to be at the top of corporate agendas, it would be a shame to miss the opportunity to ensure comprehensive reporting. This would close any gaps, ensuring that no aspects of a sector are ill-prepared for the effects of climate change.

IEMA’s response to the consultation recommended some stakeholder mapping to identify interdependencies and to close gaps.

The consultation addressed the scope of reporting, and the IEMA recommendation was for regulators to report and therefore ensure that the smaller parts or operators within their sector and regulatory remit are within scope of oversight. Regulators have various duties and powers to enable adaptation across their sectors and could be reporting on how they’re using these and on the effect that they are having.

Overall, the primary objective for adaptation reporting should be to integrate climate change risk management into the work of reporting organisations. This will raise the overall standard of adaptation planning. IEMA Climate Change Adaptation Practitioner Guidance sets out a maturity matrix for adaptation planning and delivery.

It would be helpful to standardise the reporting format so that the reports are easy to read, understand and audit. If reports are mandatory and standardised, organisations will be better able to assess their interdependencies with other organisations and risk assess the potential for cascading failures. Such assessments can only be as robust as the weakest report in the system. Auditing is essential so that the quality of reports, as well as the delivery of actions identified in the reports, can be appraised in a transparent way.

IEMA is also hoping to see reporting designed in such a way as to complement other climate reporting requirements (such as those in line with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) to avoid duplication of work. Ideally, organisations will be able to draw upon a database of mitigation and adaptation information to fulfil their reporting requirements. This will minimise compliance burdens and make mandatory reporting more acceptable.

IEMA’s Climate Change and Energy steering group members held a workshop to discuss IEMA’s response to the consultation. See the website for full details.

Image credit: Shutterstock


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

How much is too much?

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

Ben Goodwin reflects on policy, practice and advocacy over the past year

2nd April 2024

Read more

In 2020, IEMA and the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) jointly wrote and published A User Guide to Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. This has now been updated to include three key developments in the field.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Hello and welcome to another edition of Transform. I hope that you’ve had a good and productive few months so far.

28th March 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close