Case law >> 'Right' to conceal information

16th April 2012


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Air ,
  • Central government ,
  • Local government

Author

IEMA

Lexis PSL's Colleen Theron and Deirdre Lyons discuss the Birkett v Defra case and what it means for public authorities relying on disclosure exemptions under the EIR

In Birkett v Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2011] EWCA Civ 1606, the Court of Appeal held that public authorities relying on exceptions or exemptions under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) or the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse to provide environmental information may subsequently rely on further exceptions, despite not having specified those in an initial refusal to disclose information.

The EIR implement EU Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to environmental information. Public authorities can refuse a request on the basis of statutory exceptions, subject to the public interest test. Exceptions include where the request or disclosure:

  • involves the disclosure of internal communications (reg. 12(4)(e));
  • would adversely affect the course of justice, the ability of a person to receive a fair trial or the ability of a public authority to conduct an inquiry of a criminal or disciplinary nature (reg. 12(5)(b)); and
  • would adversely affect the confidentiality of the proceedings (reg. 12(5)(d)).

Article 6 of Directive 2003/4/EC provides a right of review before a court for any applicant who considers that a request for information has been ignored, wrongfully refused or inadequately answered.

Simon Birkett, director of Campaign for Clean Air in London, appealed against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) judgment that Defra could “rely as of right” on new exceptions for refusing environmental information disclosure rather than the original reasons given to the Information Commissioner and/or the First-tier Tribunal proceedings.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, which was part of an ongoing three-year battle with Defra to obtain environmental information relating to discussions between the previous government and the mayor of London on air pollution and UK compliance with EU air-quality laws.

In the original case, Defra had refused an environmental information request on the basis of the reg. 12(4)(e) exception. Birkett argued that it was necessary to interpret the Directive on public access to environmental information, and in turn the EIR as preventing public authorities from relying on new exemptions after internal review.

Without this, it was argued that the complainant would be denied an effective remedy because they would not know the public authority’s reasons for refusing their request.

At appeal, Defra continued to rely on the reg. 12(4)(e) exception, but to the extent that the disputed information benefited from legal advice privilege, it also relied on the reg. 12(5)(b) and (d) exceptions. The court concluded that Defra could rely on the new exceptions and was entitled to refuse the request.

Consequently, the general rule is that public authorities can rely on any Environmental Information Regulations or Freedom of Information exceptions or exemptions at any time.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

The time is now

Dr Julie Riggs issues a call to arms to tackle a modern-day human tragedy

15th March 2024

Read more

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

Campaign group Wild Justice has accused the UK government of trying to relax pollution rules for housebuilders “through the backdoor”.

14th February 2024

Read more

Digital tracking, packaging data delays and new collections provide a waste focus for this edition’s environmental round-up by legislation expert Neil Howe

28th November 2023

Read more

Environmental crimes could result in prison sentences of up to 10 years and company fines of 5% of turnover under a proposed EU law agreed by the European parliament and council.

21st November 2023

Read more

Stuart McLachlan and Dean Sanders discuss their book: The Adventure of Sustainable Performance: Beyond ESG Compliance to Leadership in the New Era.

14th November 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close