Case law >> Breaking free from paper chains

13th February 2012


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Pollution & Waste Management ,
  • Prevention & Control ,
  • Environment agencies ,
  • Prosecution

Author

IEMA

Colleen Theron and Deirdre Lyons from LexisPSL explain what the quashing of St Regis Paper's conviction for intentionally falsifying data means for companies with regards intent

In November 2011, the criminal division of the Court of Appeal overturned the Crown Court’s conviction of St Regis Paper Company for the offence of intentionally making a false entry in an Environment Agency (EA) record in contravention of reg. 32(1)(g) of the Pollution Prevention and Control (England and Wales) Regulations 2000 (PPC).

St Regis had to keep records of the amount of pollutants flowing into the River Culm, in Devon, from its Cullompton mill as a condition of its environmental permit.

The technical manager, Christopher Steer, had to produce daily environmental report sheets for the amount of suspended solids in the outflow from one of the plants. False readings were recorded and misleading reports returned to the EA. Consequently, in April 2011, the paper mill was ordered to pay £455,000 in fines and costs for the breaches.

The Crown Court jury also heard that a freshwater dilution system had been installed to dilute effluent with river water before it reached the sampling point, something the EA was unaware of.

Nonetheless, the Court of Appeal decided:

  • There was no basis in law for attributing the technical manager’s dishonest intentions to the company.
  • It was not possible to impose criminal liability for a breach of reg. 32(1)(g) on St Regis – as opposed to the manager with record-keeping responsibility, who was found guilty of the same offence.
  • The exception to this approach was where an intention to make a false entry could be attributed to the company by operation of the Tesco Supermarkets Limited v Nattrass rule – that the intentions of the manager could be said to be the directing mind and will of the company. But this case did not warrant imposing such liability.
  • Regulation 32(1)(g) should be seen in the context of that regulation as a whole, which showed immediately that a contrast could be drawn between offences of strict liability, such as reg. 32(1)(b)–(e), and those which require proof of intent, such as reg. 32(1)(g)–(h).
  • The conviction could not be sustained on the basis of vicarious liability.
  • The PPC Regulations 2000 have been repealed. However, reg. 38 of the successor Regulations – the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 – contain similar offences.

Despite the conviction being quashed, this case sends out a strong message to firms to not falsify environmental data.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Latest environmental legislation update

Groundbreaking legislation on air and noise pollution and measures to tackle growing concerns over disposable vapes provide the focus for Neil Howe’s environmental legislation update

6th June 2024

Read more

One in five UK food businesses are not prepared for EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) coming into force in December, a new survey has uncovered.

16th May 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Dr Julie Riggs issues a call to arms to tackle a modern-day human tragedy

15th March 2024

Read more

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

Campaign group Wild Justice has accused the UK government of trying to relax pollution rules for housebuilders “through the backdoor”.

14th February 2024

Read more

Digital tracking, packaging data delays and new collections provide a waste focus for this edition’s environmental round-up by legislation expert Neil Howe

28th November 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close