Case law: Appeal court interprets "knowingly permit"

7th March 2014


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Waste ,
  • Environment agencies ,
  • Prosecution ,
  • Management

Author

Jacqueline Brown

George Hobson from LexisPSL outlines a recent Court of Appeal case that focuses on the meaning of "knowingly permit"

The Court of Appeal (CA) has provided a useful analysis of the meaning of “knowingly permit”, which is used in the contaminated land regime, as well as in relation to waste and water pollution offences.

The Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2007 (as amended) make it an offence to knowingly permit the operation of a regulated facility without an environmental permit.

In Walker and Son (Hauliers) Ltd v Environment Agency [2014] EWCA Crim 100, land purchased by the company for redevelopment was used by another firm – Bloom (Plant) Limited, which had been contracted to demolish empty buildings on the site – as a waste transfer station.

An investigation by the local council concluded that Bloom was conducting an illegal waste operation without an environmental permit. Bloom pleaded guilty to various waste offences and Walker and Son was charged with knowingly permitting the operation of a waste facility without a permit. It pleaded guilty, but appealed, arguing that it had not been aware of the need for or omission of the permit.

The CA had to decide whether it was necessary for the defendant to have knowledge that the waste operation was not authorised or whether knowledge of waste activities at the site was sufficient for liability.

On dismissing the appeal, the court held that the words “knowingly permit” related to knowledge of the facts and not as to the existence of the environmental permit. It also held that the prosecution did not have to show that a defendant knew that the matters of which it was aware were not permitted.


Transform articles

Regulator publishes new code to tackle 'greenwashing'

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.

22nd September 2021

Read more

The UK government must develop regulation to stop the financial sector from providing billions of pounds to companies that threaten rainforests worldwide, WWF has said.

10th September 2021

Read more

Over two million hectares of Brazilian rainforest could be legally converted to supply the UK with soy under a new anti-deforestation law proposed by the government, the WWF has found.

26th August 2021

Read more

The Better Business Act would put responsibility to society and the environment on the same footing as responsibility to shareholders, explains Chris Turner

30th July 2021

Read more

In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).

30th July 2021

Read more

Thames Water has been fined £4m after untreated sewage escaped from sewers below London into a park and a river.

30th July 2021

Read more

In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.

28th May 2021

Read more

Are voluntary commitments enough to make the private sector act on waste? David Burrows explores the issues

28th May 2021

Read more

Government announcements on infrastructure reveal a direction of travel but key details are still unknown, says Huw Morris

29th January 2021

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert