Businessman fined £84,000 for breaching permit

1st June 2020


Web p11 refuse to fuel shutterstock 639146761

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Waste ,
  • Water ,
  • Pollution & Waste Management

Author

IEMA

The director of A Morrey Distribution Limited (AMDL) faces a bill of £84,000 for failing to comply with an enforcement notice requiring him to submit a fire prevention plan for a former permitted site at Garner Street, Stoke-on-Trent.

The 69-year-old from Madeley, near Crewe, was fined £1,000 for failing to comply with an enforcement notice, and ordered to pay £50,000 in prosecution costs and a confiscation order of £33,000. This is to be paid to the Environment Agency and will go towards ensuring the site is safe. A default prison sentence of 12-18 months could be triggered if the sum is unpaid.

The director had pleaded guilty to four offences in June 2017 and the company entered guilty pleas to four similar charges of breaching permit conditions, contrary to the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010, between November 2014 and April 2016. There was no separate penalty for offences committed by the company due to its financial status.

The court heard that AMDL had been granted an environmental permit to store refuse-derived fuel (RDF) on a temporary basis at its Garner Street site. During 11 inspections between 2014 and 2016, Agency officers noted that bales of RDF were being stockpiled over the limits allowed. Around 18,000 tonnes of waste were deposited and stored in three different buildings across the site.

Some of the RDF bales were leaching a black liquid and giving off a foul odour. The bales presented a risk of self-combustion, with potentially serious consequences due to the site's proximity to the A500 and the West Coast Main Line. Concerns were raised by the Agency, but the businessman failed to carry out any action to reduce the risk of fire, even after a suspension notice was issued. The permit was later revoked.

The judge noted that the breaches had occurred shortly after the permit had been issued by the Agency. He stated that the director had been “utterly stupid“ to have entered into an arrangement with a third party to accept the bales without a proper written agreement.

Credit was given for early guilty pleas entered in 2017 by the company and its director, and the judge acknowledged that all parties had genuinely attempted to find a solution to enable the site to be cleared of all waste, and that this had delayed the conclusion of proceedings.

He reiterated that the businessman had been given every opportunity to comply with the regulations, but took no action. The Agency's responsibilities gave it little choice but to suspend operations at the site and pursue prosecution. The Agency is facilitating the sale of the site so it can be cleared.

Picture credit: Shutterstock

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Weather damage insurance claims hit record high

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

Senior consultant, EcoAct

3rd April 2024

Read more

Around 20% of the plastic recycled is polypropylene, but the diversity of products it protects has prevented safe reprocessing back into food packaging. Until now. David Burrows reports

3rd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close