Bigger fines proposed for environment offences

14th March 2013

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Water ,
  • Waste ,
  • Business & Industry ,
  • Corporate fine ,
  • Prosecution



Firms that deliberately breach legislation and cause substantial harm to the environment will face fines of up to £2 million in England and Wales, under proposed sentencing guidelines

The Sentencing Council has published a draft of its first guidance for magistrates on penalties for environmental offences, saying that they should be imposing bigger fines for the most serious cases.

The guideline outlines suggested fines for offences related to waste management and disposal, waste permits and nuisance, under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, the Environmental Permitting Regulations (England and Wales) 2010 and the Control of Pollution (Amendment) Act 1989.

According to the guidance, magistrates should impose fines based on the level of harm caused, the level of culpability – whether the offence was committed deliberately, recklessly or negligently – and the size of the organisation. The council has defined organisation size in terms of turnover: large firms are those with a revenue exceeding £25.9 million a year; medium sized those with a turnover of between £6.5 million and £25.9 million; and small firms have a turnover of no more than £6.5 million.

The starting point for penalties for large firms that deliberately dispose of dangerous polluting waste or cause substantial harm to the environment, for example, would be £750,000 under the proposals, but they could face fines of up to £2 million.

Meanwhile, reckless acts that cause serious harm should carry fines of up to £1 million, while negligent firms that pollute the environment causing long-term damage should receive penalties of between £55,000 and £395,000.

Penalties for medium-sized firms should extend to £690,000 in the most serious of cases, according to the guidelines and up to £70,000 for small companies.

Sentencing Council member and magistrate Katharine Rainsford said: “We’re improving guidance for courts to help ensure consistent and appropriate sentences for offenders, particularly for corporate offenders who can be guilty of the worst offences.

“These offences are normally motivated by making or saving money at the expense of the taxpayer. Our proposals aim to ensure that sentences hit offenders in their pocket.”

According to figures from the Environment Agency, the largest fine issued in 2011 for a waste offence was £170,000.

The Sentencing Council’s draft guideline, which will apply in England and Wales only, is the subject of a public consultation which closes on 6 June.

Transform articles

Regulator publishes new code to tackle 'greenwashing'

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.

22nd September 2021

Read more

The UK government must develop regulation to stop the financial sector from providing billions of pounds to companies that threaten rainforests worldwide, WWF has said.

10th September 2021

Read more

Over two million hectares of Brazilian rainforest could be legally converted to supply the UK with soy under a new anti-deforestation law proposed by the government, the WWF has found.

26th August 2021

Read more

The Better Business Act would put responsibility to society and the environment on the same footing as responsibility to shareholders, explains Chris Turner

30th July 2021

Read more

In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).

30th July 2021

Read more

Thames Water has been fined £4m after untreated sewage escaped from sewers below London into a park and a river.

30th July 2021

Read more

In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.

28th May 2021

Read more

Are voluntary commitments enough to make the private sector act on waste? David Burrows explores the issues

28th May 2021

Read more

Government announcements on infrastructure reveal a direction of travel but key details are still unknown, says Huw Morris

29th January 2021

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert