Better consideration of cumulative effects

27th January 2014


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Local government ,
  • Renewable ,
  • Construction

Author

Timothy Rimmer

Alexia Chapman, from AMEC, shares advice on how environmental impact assessment (EIA) practitioners can more effectively account for cumulative effects

One of the weakest aspects of EIA is the assessment of cumulative effects. Uncertainty over the potential cumulative impacts of projects can lead to significant delays in achieving consent.

Several guidance documents have been created to aid developers in undertaking EIA. However, advice on the cumulative impact assessment (CIA) process is limited with very little practical guidance on how to go about this.

As part of The Crown Estate’s enabling actions programme for the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters (PFOW), a common approach was developed to facilitate the CIA process for wave and tidal current developments. This work is part of The Crown Estate’s PFOW cumulative impacts workstream. While this study was aimed at the wave and tidal energy developments in the PFOW, the outputs are likely to be relevant to developments across the UK not just offshore renewables.

The study found several issues that merited consideration and the development of a common approach. From reviewing a number of case studies it became clear that there were two key issues that frequently occurred; not starting the CIA early enough in the EIA process (i.e. during scoping) and a lack of clarity over what projects to include.

Scoping

Early identification of potentially significant cumulative effects as part of the scoping process has often been considered to be too superficial in its nature given the lack of information that may be available at this stage. However, early identification of cumulative effects can be beneficial to the developer, as it can enable the potentially significant effects to be resolved in a timely and cost effective fashion. Scoping helps developers focus on the key impacts and makes the approach to CIA efficient and proportionate.

There can be drawbacks to identifying cumulative effects too early in the scoping process, however, and a practical project-specific approach needs to be adopted. Due to the often lengthy time between the initial identification of potentially significant cumulative effects (the scope) and an application being submitted, the CIA scope may change as new projects (or later phases of existing projects) enter the process and others are changed or abandoned.

The CIA scope should, therefore, be kept under review until the final design of the proposed development is identified. To prevent the process of deciding which developments should be considered in the CIA from lasting indefinitely, a final cut-off date needs to be established. This date represents that point in time which the gathering of data for CIA stops and the environmental statement is pulled together and written prior to submission. This needs to be set by mutual agreement between the developer and regulator.

What to include in CIA

One of the key questions to be asked is: At what stage in the planning process should a project be before it is included in CIA? As the legislation does not specify exactly which projects to include, several key documents have attempted to provide guidance on this aspect.

All guidance agrees that projects that have entered the planning process (i.e. that have at least submitted an application for consent) should be included where relevant or necessary. More recently, however, there has been the tendency to also include “reasonably foreseeable” future projects. Determining what is meant by “reasonably foreseeable” is difficult, however, and leaving the CIA open to include a wide range of projects that may never be implemented. This is especially pertinent in cases of emerging industries and novel technologies, where certainty as to whether a project will be constructed is less likely.

In reality, for an effective CIA to be undertaken, only projects with full datasets which have been adequately analysed and assessed can be included. Such information is only likely to become available once an application has been submitted. It is reasonable to suggest that it should be the responsibility of the competent authority to include in its scoping opinion any other projects which were submitted subsequently in the CIA process.

During the study it became clear that reasonably foreseeable projects could be defined as projects for which a scoping opinion has been sought and, where relevant, should be included in the CIA. However, only a qualitative assessment can be carried out on these projects due to the lack of available data.

Finally, this approach was developed using existing guidance, case study outcomes and considerable input from many stakeholders. CIA issues are being debated not just within the PFOW, but across several development areas in the UK, therefore any knowledge and learning gained will clearly aid the EIA process in the future.


This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Alexia Chapman is a senior consultant of marine ecology at AMEC.

The Crown Estate’s full report can be dowloaded from thecrownestate.co.uk

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

IEMA Impact: Shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is updating its advice note on non-technical summaries (NTS).

31st May 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close