Backtracking on CO2 targets bad for economy

11th October 2011


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Mitigation ,
  • Carbon Trading ,
  • Central government

Author

IEMA

Government plans to review the UK's carbon budgets is a mistake that could harm the country's ability to reap the rewards of shifting to a green economy, warns the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC).

In publishing its latest report on carbon budgets and their potential impact on the UK, the EAC labelled the coalition’s attitude towards climate change as schizophrenic, arguing that the planned review of the UK’s commitments to cut carbon emissions in 2014 could harm investment in low-carbon technology.

“Five years on from the Stern report the Treasury still doesn’t get climate change – or the risk it poses to global stability and economic prosperity,” said Joan Walley MP, chair of the EAC.

“While the prime minister is to be commended for not faltering when setting the fourth long-term carbon budget, he risks throwing the UK’s climate targets off-course by instigating a review in just three years time that could overturn the commitment.”

Fellow EAC member Zac Goldsmith MP warned that ministers must realise that “with the stroke of a pen, they can make a good investment bad”.

“The one risk that all investors highlight when they consider putting funds into clean technology is policy change,” he said. “Unless [policymakers] provide real long-term certainty, the transition to a low-carbon economy will be slower and bumpier than it needs to be.”

In June, the government adopted the recommendations of the Committee on Climate Change to ensure CO2 emissions are cut by 50% on 1990 levels as a part of the fourth carbon budget (2023-37), but at the same time announced it would review the targets in 2014, to ensure they were not more demanding that those being achieved in Europe.

However, the EAC report warns that the 50% target is the minimum the UK needs to ensure it can cut emissions by 80% by 2050 and that international discussions are building the case for more, not less, ambitious targets. Green investment, it says, is a win-win solution to the country’s financial difficulties and the 2014 review brings into doubt the future direction of CO2 cuts, and risks weakening investor confidence.

Manufacturing trade organisation the EEF reacted the EAC’s comments by defending the need for the review of carbon budgets.

“The chancellor last week highlighted the need to avoid moving faster than our competitors,” said Steve Radley, EEF director of policy. “The government must now review the carbon budget targets in 2014 so that any target adopted reflects what is achievable and, at a cost which can be sustained.

“Damaging the UK economy without achieving significant global reductions in emissions is not the way forward. The UK must provide a leadership role that shows decarbonising and growing the economy can go hand in hand.”

The deputy-general of the CBI, Dr Neil Bentley, agreed that the review was sensible.

“We want an economy that is low-carbon and competitive,” he said. “A review … will ensure the UK doesn’t get out of step with European competitors, but what’s really important is that the government delivers a clear framework for companies to invest with confidence.”

Bentley’s comments followed his speech last night at the CBI’s international Green Business Dinner, where he argued that British businesses want to tackle climate change, but are being hampered by government’s failure to provide policy certainty.

He warned that government’s drive to transition to a low-carbon economy as a way of improving international competitiveness has back fired.

“We wanted first-mover advantage,” he said. “We acted without realising what was around the corner economically. So today, despite our green ambitions, economic and political realities bite. We find ourselves not ahead of the pack, but out on a limb.

“We’ve got no international deal, no global carbon price, no meaningful EU price and the UK tying itself in costly green policy knots. The UK is in danger of straining to hit its targets but missing the point: that we need an economy that’s low carbon and competitive.”

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

EU and UK citizens fear net-zero delivery deficit

Support for net zero remains high across the UK and the EU, but the majority of citizens don't believe that major emitters and governments will reach their climate targets in time.

16th May 2024

Read more

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

Taxing the extraction of fossil fuels in the world’s most advanced economies could raise $720bn (£575bn) by 2030 to support vulnerable countries facing climate damages, analysis has found.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close