Application for judicial review of badger culling decision refused

11th December 2020

Web p11 hires cmyk shutterstock 220464949

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Agriculture ,
  • Biodiversity


Riya Patel

In R (on the application of National Farmers Union) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the claimant applied for judicial review of the Secretary's direction to Natural England concerning badger culling.

A group of farmers had involved the second claimant company to apply for a badger culling licence to prevent bovine tuberculosis (bTB) spread within a Derbyshire cull zone. The first claimant trade union supported the company during the process.

Natural England was responsible for issuing badger disease control licences each year. In September 2019, the Secretary directed Natural England, under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, not to grant any licences in Derbyshire before May 2020. She referred to badger vaccination projects within the county and the need to respond to the Godfray independent review of the bTB eradication strategy.

Natural England had been about to grant the company a licence as its zone fell within the top 10 areas identified for a licence, and it had shown it could deliver a cull in compliance with statutory guidance. The claimant submitted that the direction was an unlawful departure from policy, frustrated its legitimate expectation about what matters would be taken into account and that it would obtain a licence if requirements were met, and was Wednesbury unreasonable.

In regards to whether it was an unlawful departure from policy, Parliament had decided that the Secretary should have the power to tell Natural England what to do, and nothing in the 2006 Act restricted the exercise of that power. Nothing in the guidance amounted to a promise that if the relevant area was in the top 10 and fulfilled requirements, a licence would be granted. The claimant also failed to demonstrate that the Secretary had considered immaterial factors or had excluded material factors, therefore not satisfying the Wednesbury unreasonableness argument.

The judge concluded that the Secretary had made a political judgment with regard to the county's badger vaccination programme, anti-culling lobby and risk of fallout if a vaccinated badger was killed, and her conclusion had not been irrational. The application was refused.

Image credit: Shutterstock

Transform articles

MPs criticise ‘lopsided’ plans to prevent investment funds from greenwashing

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) must do more to tackle investment funds that have misled customers with exaggerated sustainability claims, and not punish victims, a cross-party group of MPs has said.

14th March 2023

Read more

Most UK businesses strongly support environmental regulation, with just one-fifth believing that the current rules are excessive, a new survey has found.

3rd March 2023

Read more

Neil Howe takes an in-depth look at the potential impact of the Retained EU Law Bill

2nd February 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s policy team outline the key issues facing sustainability professionals in 2023 and beyond

2nd February 2023

Read more

IEMA’s deputy CEO, Martin Baxter, outlines the key regulations and standards to look out for in 2023

2nd February 2023

Read more

A landfill site in Glasgow has been served with a civil penalty fine of £6,200 following a breach of its environmental permit which resulted in the release of odours that affected local communities over a period of eight days in June 2021 and saw 138 complaints.

31st January 2023

Read more

An influential Lords Committee has recommended the establishment of a new commission in England to improve decisions and processes determining how land is used.

27th January 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert