A fresh look at environmental statements

16th January 2012

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Management ,
  • Benchmarking ,
  • Construction



Environmental planners Helen Kent and Elizabeth Davies consider the benefits of having environmental statements independently reviewed.

An important aspect of the EIA Quality Mark process is the opportunity to have IEMA peer review participants’ environmental statements (ESs). Such impartial examinations not only offer good feedback for environmental impact assessment (EIA) professionals but can also be useful to other stakeholders in the planning process.

Developers, consultees and local planning authorities, whether they receive many EIA applications or one every few months, can all benefit from the experience and knowledge offered by consulting with a third-party. As well as offering technical expertise which may not be held in-house and freeing up resources to deal with other elements of a planning application, an independent review of environmental statements can help to ensure:

  • Informed decision making – An independent review checks for regulatory compliance, and identifies whether sufficient environmental information has been provided to make a decision on the application.
  • Reduced risk of legal challenge – By ensuring decisions are made based on environmental information which meets the requirements of the EIA regulations.
  • The potential to speed up decision making and reduce costs – by targeting requests for any additional information.

A “stamp” of approval from an independent consultant can also help smooth the planning process.

The review process

The review method we use at LUC and Cascade Consulting is based on IEMA’s EIA Quality Mark ES review criteria, which aim to effectively assess the content and quality of an ES and then communicate it in a focused report.

We use the targeted questions provided in IEMA’s review criteria to check whether an ES provides enough information for the likely significant environmental effects of the proposed development to be identified, but we don’t assign a quality score.

Regulation 22 requests

The review report flags up the potential need for requests for information under Regulation 22 of the Town and Country Planning (EIA) Regulations 2011, and for any other clarifications. This pragmatic approach ensures that Regulation 22 requests are only used where information is necessary to inform the decision. Clarifying matters informally like this saves time, and may avoid the need to re-advertise the application.

Of the 35 ES reviews that we have carried out for the London Borough of Tower Hamlets since July 2009, all resulted in requests for clarification and around two-thirds resulted in requests under Regulation 22.

A more complete ES is often submitted the second time in cases where an application is withdrawn and re-submitted. For example, of six schemes which were subject to two ES reviews (for the original application and a re-submission) we identified potential Regulation 22 requests for all six original ESs, but for only two of the re-submitted statements.

Effective resourcing

For local planning authorities that receive many applications for EIA purposes the amount of material to review can be daunting. Freeing up resources to concentrate on other aspects of the planning application can help to reduce the time taken to make decisions.

Providing tailored scoping guidance can help applicants to address the most important local environmental issues and aid the identification of baseline evidence sources and clarify any methodological requirements.

LUC and Cascade Consulting helped Tower Hamlets to produce scoping guidance which highlights local issues as townscape and visual impacts, air quality, sunlight (in relation to tall buildings) and noise, and this is available on the council’s website.

Another potential benefit of independent reviews is that they can be focused on one particular aspects of an ES, for example deciphering townscape or noise assessments. This approach is often taken when assisting statutory bodies and groups are seeking to make targeted comments on a major development.

Lessons learned

Drawing on our experiences of reviewing ESs, many of which have been excellent, one thing has become very clear: communication is everything. ESs report on complex, technical issues and it is vital to clearly set out, and justify, the approach that has been taken to scoping, assessment, significance, alternatives, mitigation, and cumulative effects. Remember if a lay person cannot understand the ES, it will not be helpful to the decision maker.

Other important learning points for those writing ES to consider are:

  • Non-technical summaries must accurately reflect the impacts identified in the ES.
  • Where townscape, visual and heritage assessments are carried out by the architects promoting the scheme, it can be difficult to report impacts with objectivity.
  • The assessment of construction impacts is sometimes omitted as something to be addressed through a planning condition, but should be covered in the ES.
  • The credibility of the whole ES can be affected by a few judgements that are not justified, and which may appear to the lay reader to be unreasonable or unlikely.

This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

LUC and Cascade Consulting are framework consultants to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets and carry out independent reviews of ESs. We regularly provide independent review services to statutory consultees and other stakeholders, and undertake between 5–10 EIAs each year.

For further information contact: [email protected]


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close