Modelling for bird collision risk in offshore wind

17th December 2019


Web offshore wind istock 1138600638

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Environmental Impact Assessment

Author

Simon Pickup

Sinead Petersen of Xodus Group discusses the challenges associated with bird collision risk modelling for cumulative impact assessment

Worldwide, wind power generation has been one the fastest-growing industries within the renewable energy sector. Due to its rapid growth in the UK, there is growing concern over offshore wind's cumulative impact on the marine environment. One of the main concerns is the cumulative impact associated with seabird collision risks with wind. The UK is of particular interest as the surrounding coastal waters feature a number of Special Protected Areas (SPAs) – areas protected under the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC).

Some species of seabird are thought to collide and/or be displaced by offshore wind farm developments. However, for the majority of the time, species such as Arctic skua (Stercorarius parasiticus), Manx shearwater (Puffinus puffinus), little auk (Alle alle) and Atlantic puffin (Fratercula arctica) fly near the sea surface, not at turbine. Some species-specific models, considering flight height as a factor, are now being produced to better reflect the proportion of populations potentially at higher risk. In addition, migratory pathways towards seabird breeding grounds, overwintering sites and areas close to SPAs are considered to be higher risk in terms of collisions.

The majority of collision models involve calculating the probability of a collision occurring between a wind turbine and a seabird, assuming no evasive action or behaviour has taken place, and measuring the number of birds within a 'risk window'. Using this information, the number of collisions expected to take place is estimated.

Within EU and UK legislation there is a requirement to carry out a cumulative impact assessment (CIA) as part of an environmental impact assessment (EIA). However, a common consensus is that there is a lack of detailed guidance, particularly on the assessments (ie collision risk modelling), within the EIA process that restricts the ability to show a detailed and 'true' picture of the potential impacts of wind turbines on seabird populations. There is a concern that CIA is constrained by a lack of understanding of the effect wind farms are having on seabirds. Despite the monitoring measures in place, uncertainty remains around the potential impact that the large development of offshore turbines entering the marine environment may have on seabirds.

In the UK, before applying for consent to construct an offshore wind farm, the developer must monitor the bird densities within their development site to inform their EIA. Data can be collected using a variety of different camera techniques and survey types, including aerial, boat and visual surveys. Further monitoring is sometimes necessary for consent to be granted by the regulatory body. However, this process relies heavily on assumptions, as mortality from collision is estimated using collision risk models. This uncertainty has been explicitly recognised for a number of years. On top of this issue, the data is often confidential to the project and therefore cannot be used by other developers to inform their own CIA. As a result, CIA is often restricted spatially and temporally, and geographical boundaries are not always specified.

As a potential solution to this issue, Masden et al. (2010) suggested CIA should be the responsibility of the regulatory body rather than the developer. This will remove the confidentiality issue regarding data availability between developments and allow for a more strategic approach with a greater amount of data. Overall, this would increase the accuracy of cumulative collision risk modelling. However, changes to data collection methods will still need to be made. Until a standardised method is developed and utilised, CIA will provide the same amount of value as it does presently.

Collision risk models are a valuable tool for EIA and have the potential to benefit the CIA process if they are adapted to become more strategic. For this to be accomplished in an effective manner, collision risk models will need to be modified to account for larger scale developments. Data for surrounding developments could also become available to developers if the responsibility for data collection was moved to the relevant regulatory body, as suggested by Masden et al. in their paper 'Cumulative impact assessments and bird/wind farm interactions: Developing a conceptual framework'. Not only would the data be available for all developers, but the methodology used for data collection would be consistent across all projects. This could result in projects becoming more comparable and increase the reliability of the CIA process.

Sinead Petersen is a graduate environmental consultant in the Environment Team at Xodus Group, London.

Image credit: iStock

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Advice note on health impact assessments

An advice note on health impact assessments and health in environmental assessments is set to be published by IEMA soon.

31st May 2024

Read more

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close