EIA scoping process works, research shows

7th March 2015


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Management

Author

John Macnamara

Non-key issues are being successfully scoped out of environmental impact assessments (EIAs) for major infrastructure projects, according to an analysis by consultancy Aecom.

Aecom studied the EIAs for 15 nationally significant infrastructure projects (NSIPs) that have received government consent. These vary from a rail freight terminal in Daventry to large offshore wind farms.

Impacts on traffic and landscape were included in all of the environmental statements (ESs) that were analysed. Archaeology and cultural heritage, ecology, geology and ground conditions, and noise were each covered in all but one of the project applications. But other topics were considered in far fewer applications. Impacts on climate change and sustainability, marine mammals and nature conservation were each reviewed in five or fewer projects.

The ES for Hornsea offshore wind farm off Yorkshire had 25 chapters covering technical issues, the highest number in the sample. The Willington C Gas Pipeline near Burton-on-Trent had the fewest, with only eight. Marine-based infrastructure generated the largest ESs, most likely due to projects having both onshore and offshore components, the consultants believe. ESs for projects that are solely onshore have 10-12 technical chapters.

Laurence Copleston, EIA coordinator at Aecom, said the findings were interesting in the light of government claims that applicants are undertaking some technical assessments unnecessarily to avoid legal challenges. “Scoping is a fairly effective process and robust enough to remove topics if they are not required,” he said.

However, NSIPs cover many sectors so it is difficult to judge conclusively if any ES is too big, he added.

In a statement to parliament last week, communities and local government minister Brandon Lewis reiterated the government's belief that environmental impact assessments were "gold-plating" European policy. He said: "This increases the workload of developers, local planning authorities and the consultation bodies, adding cost and creating delays. There is currently confusion about when they are required, leading to gold-plating of the directive by local authorities and developers."

This article was written using data from a submission to IEMA's EIA Quality Mark programme. You can read the full article here.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

IEMA Impact: Shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is updating its advice note on non-technical summaries (NTS).

31st May 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close