EIA, planning and permitting

8th July 2014

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Management ,
  • Environment agencies ,
  • Noise


Adrian Early

Robin Overton says an early understanding of the different requirements for planning and permitting applications will help make both processes easier.

For planning applications associated with projects that also require an application for an environmental permit for a Part A process under Schedule 1 part 2 of the EPR Regulations (issued by the Environment Agency) there is an overlap in the requirements and early awareness and thought is required when specifying the scope of studies to minimise costs and ensure their suitability.

The requirements for environmental permitting include issues such as air quality, noise, ground conditions, discharges to water and these issues must also be addressed at the planning stage albeit to different levels of detail and with a different focus. Other areas addressed at the planning stage, such as traffic, socioeconomic impacts and archaeology, are either not applicable or less applicable at the environmental permitting stage.

Often detailed air quality models, noise models and others have to be presented in support of an application for planning and an environmental permit. Ideally, applicants should prepare one report that is suitable for both purposes.

But there are many obstacles to this approach.

  1. The planning application is submitted to the local authority, and to the Environment Agency (EA) as a statutory consultee. But the recipients of the planning application in the EA are often not the specialists that will be involved in subsequent permitting discussions. It cannot be assumed that just because a planning application has been approved by the council that the EA are fully accepting of the proposals and that an environmental permit will be granted without further discussion. There are specific requirements for the environmental permitting process that are not addressed in the planning process – the justification and best available techniques (BAT) demonstrations, for example. Experience indicates that the EA’s permitting specialists do not fully assess the information submitted at the planning stage.
  2. Planning is often required before the permitting process starts. But the level of detail available at the start of the planning process if the project is at an early stage (as in projects using a front end engineering design (FEED) approach) may not be suitable and sufficient for an environmental permitting application. This should not stop the planning process but it is important to be aware of the future permitting requirements to minimise the potential for future conflicts. Experience indicates that there can often be significant uncertainty about the final design at the planning stage with the layout often not fixed, information on equipment from suppliers not available (including noise and air emissions) and vendors not selected. It is often necessary to attempt to define a worst-case envelope for the emissions at the planning stage to proceed with the planning application and its supporting assessments. The risks associated with this approach need to be considered. Design layouts often have to be amended as design details change and further information becomes available. If noise or air emissions increase, remodelling and extra controls may be required, such as enclosures or increased stack heights. These may conflict with approved planning drawings and result in applications for variations having to be submitted.
  3. Financial approval can be another headache. An increasing number of clients try to obtain planning consents and environmental permits prior to full project sanction (as a precondition of project sanction) meaning detailed design information which is required to prepare an application for an environmental permit is unavailable. There are dangers inherent in this approach since both the planning permission granted and the environmental permit issued depend on the information in the applications. Any amended designs: layout, equipment changes and so on – may need planning variations and/or variations to the environmental permit. Both of these can be costly, time-consuming and potentially cause delays.

In an ideal situation once the requirement for both planning and permitting has been determined early discussions should be held with the planning authorities and with the environment agency permitting officer to determine the timescales and requirements from both regulatory and project perspectives. This way the different requirements of both sides can be discussed along with the project constraints such as information availability and financial sanctions. Experience indicates that there can be significant variability in the requests for information from planning authorities so the sooner their local circumstances are understood the sooner the application process can be geared to addressing their requirements.

This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Robin Overton is an associate director at RSK Environment


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Advice note on health impact assessments

An advice note on health impact assessments and health in environmental assessments is set to be published by IEMA soon.

31st May 2024

Read more

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close