EIA for multiple S.73 applications

6th November 2013


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Resource extraction ,
  • Energy ,
  • Construction ,
  • Consultancy ,
  • Stewardship

Author

IEMA

Alison Carroll from Nicholas Pearson Associates reflects on the challenges posed by an environmental impact assessment (EIA) relating to the Wytch Farm, Wareham and Kimmeridge oilfields

In 2011/12, Nicholas Pearson Associates coordinated the EIA for a proposal to extend the planning consents relating to the Wytch Farm, Wareham and Kimmeridge oilfields in Dorset. At the outset, a few fundamental questions had to be answered.

What planning consents were required?

The planning history of the oilfields is extremely long and complex. The Kimmeridge Oilfield, for instance, was first discovered back in 1959. The oilfields have been developed incrementally since then.

By 2011, when Perenco UK took over as operator of the oilfields, there were more than 50 live planning consents relating to the three oilfields. These covered a range of sites, including: a gathering station, an access road, offices, a sea water pumping station, a causeway, 12 well sites and numerous infield pipelines.

The majority of consents included a planning condition requiring restoration to be completed in 2016, although some ended in 2019 or 2020, and some were not time limited at all.

It was established that 39 planning applications would need to be submitted under section 37 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended). Thirty-five planning applications would seek extensions to 2037, two to 2032 and two to 2027.

Was EIA required?

Yes! While many of the individual planning applications could have been subject to screening and would not have exceeded any EIA thresholds, it was clear that collectively they sought to extend the operation of all three oilfields by more than 20 years. The potential for this to give rise to significant environmental effects was obvious, especially given that the oilfields are located within a very environmentally sensitive area.

Collectively the sites fall either within or adjacent to an area of outstanding natural beauty, heritage coast, a world heritage site and several special areas of conservation, special protection areas, Ramsar sites and sites of special scientific interest.

What would the scope of the EIA be?

The scope of the EIA had to be broad ranging, both geographically and in terms of topic areas. The EIA could not, for example, simply consider those elements that were subject to the 39 planning applications, but had to consider the impacts of the whole development as extended.

The EIA also included consideration of the Purbeck to Southampton pipeline, which was not subject to consent from the Mineral Planning Authority and did not require a time extension.

The EIA had to consider impacts against two different baselines:

  • the conditions present in 2011 with all sites operating as they did at that time; and
  • the conditions that, based on available restoration proposals, could have prevailed in the future had the sites been restored in 2016. For ease, a 2016 end-point was adopted for all sites.

It soon became apparent that if only the existing baseline was used then the impacts of retaining the sites would be negligible. All of the sites were already in place and operating, and there were no plans to physically extend the sites or do anything radically different within them – in the future it was largely going to be “business as usual”.

Assessing only against the existing baseline would miss the fact that the proposals delayed restoration to heathland, woodland or agriculture, and maintained hydrocarbon extraction and processing over the extended period.

Establishing the 2011 baseline was straightforward, the real challenge was to work out what might have happened post-2016 if the oilfield consents were not extended.

How would the environmental statement be structured?

Environmental statements (ES) are often criticised for their length and unwieldy nature, but could a concise ES be written to cover all of the sites, access roads and pipelines and meet the requirements of 39 separate planning applications?The honest answer is: no. However, the ES was structured as logically as possible.

One overarching volume was produced that provided an overview of all of the impacts cumulatively across the development. Seventeen additional volumes of varying length then acted as “mini-ESs” for each location.

This was my most challenging ES to coordinate to date and an experience that I have learned a great deal from. Some of the lessons learned from the process will be the subject of a future article.


This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Alison Carroll, MIEMA CEnv, is an associate environmental planner at Nicholas Pearson Associates, and a registered EIA practitioner.

The input of the client and all of the consultants who contributed to the ES is acknowledged, including Savills who are also IEMA EIA Quality Mark registrants.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Facing the climate emergency challenge in local government

It’s well recognised that the public sector has the opportunity to work towards a national net-zero landscape that goes well beyond improving on its own performance; it can also influence through procurement and can direct through policy.

19th March 2024

Read more

Dr Julie Riggs issues a call to arms to tackle a modern-day human tragedy

15th March 2024

Read more

Disgraced environmental consultant Peter Lovebrother is another month nearer retirement…

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

Multinational corporations are undermining their net-zero commitments with excessive air travel and no plans to reduce ‘the low hanging fruit’ of carbon footprints, a study by Transport & Environment has found.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s climate adaptation plans are ‘inadequate’ and falling ‘far short’ of what is required, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) has warned today.

13th March 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close